• bigmamoth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I want rockstar to miserably fail gta6 Not for union busting Cause rockstar make wokke trash So yeah boycott that shit

  • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Rockstar management did not have direct access to the server prior to October 2025, but the former workers and their legal team allege that “from at least February 2024, [Rockstar HR director] Charlie Kinloch had been receiving information from a junior employee on trade union activity inside the Server”. They claim that “over 21 months, at least 26 meetings or communications took place between Mr Kinloch and [the junior employee] concerning the Server, roughly half of them initiated by Mr Kinloch himself”. Related

    The “mole” is said to have “supplied screenshots and recordings, reported union meetings, training sessions and union membership numbers, and identified individual union activists”. On 7th October 2025, they allegedly informed Kinlock that the union were 12 members away from the statutory threshold for recognition - 10% of the workforce. The union eventually reached this milestone on 18th October, with Kinloch learning of this on 20th October, the fired workers claim. At some point in this period, they go on, Rockstar management got hold of logins for the server, with Rockstar’s vice president of information security Abid Ansari eventually signing in to download “the contents of the Announcements and General channels”. Rockstar began firing members of the Discord at the end of the month.

    Just classic union busting. Srsly. Don’t fucking give Rockstar money now of all times. Sales number is the only language they speak. If you support unions, at least fucking wait on GTA 6. Wait until workers get rehired, unions enancted, Rockstar stops breaking employment laws.

    If waiting too much of a bother, if you want the game too much, then go ahead and cross the picket line. Know it’s full of fired workers with families to support, some losing their homes, some losing the country as work visas getting revoked/being deported, all becoming unhirable in the industry since their last reference is claiming misconduct. But if none of that is a problem, then go ahead and be a scab.

  • Cris_Citrus (he/him <3)@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    For anyone who wants more coverage of this, the “people make games” channel on YouTube has been doing ongoing coverage where they discuss things with the worker and talk about what had been happening

    Great channel

  • Guitar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    2 days ago

    Rockstar is a disgusting company. I wish everyone would see them for the filth they are rather than blindly guzzling GTA VI hype. More than ever in their history, their game deserves to fail. But unfortunately, too many people will hold their nose and ensure it’s a giant success.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not that I personally give a fuck about GTA generally, but it does make me upset that one of the few methods we have to “police” these companies as consumers is to not buy the game. To take a massive project that consumed however many years of work by however many developers and artists just and make it a commercial failure just to… stick it to their bosses? It’s like refusing to buy a musician’s CD because you don’t like the record company they made a deal with. Nobody gets to enjoy the music and the musician makes less money. This system sucks.

      • spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        2 days ago

        The employees have already been paid as much as they’re going to and will be rewarded by being laid off. Not buying it only punishes the shithead management that will otherwise give themselves massive year end bonuses.

        • Dagnet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          2 days ago

          Exactly. The triple A industry pretty much never passes profits to the devs and a game selling well does not lead to job security. Don’t buy the game or pirate it, there no moral issue here

          • theparadox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Given that the power to support the game is literally the only power we have, there is no moral issue - I agree. I don’t, however, understand what’s wrong with wishing for a system that gives consumers and workers more options.

        • theparadox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          will be rewarded by being laid off. Not buying it only punishes the shithead management

          While I agree with the sentiment, that’s a gross oversimplification.

          • While I’m sure the studio will likely downsize and lay off staff, many will stay on.
          • Passion and care inevitably went into the game, to some degree. I would be surprised if devs and artists were indifferent to its success, whether they kept their jobs or not.
          • It’s hugely different to be laid off after a hit game vs a failure of a game, when it comes to finding new work.
          • The art itself, if it was of any quality, is wasted.

          Again, I’m not advocating people buy it. I just wish we had the power to fight some other way. I won’t be buying it, but I wouldn’t have bought it anyway. It will also very likely sell like hotcakes, regardless of our posturing.

    • dudeface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      56
      ·
      2 days ago

      They won their initial case, the other tribunals will be done before launch

      Not sure where your hate is coming from but it doesn’t seem anyone was fired unfairly

        • dudeface@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          2 days ago

          How?; they won tribunals so far and the company is unionising

          These people were fired for breaching contracts, wasn’t union busting

          • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Correct! There can be no mercy for criminal scum.

            My only regret is that HR didn’t go further. The contract breakers should’ve been taken to a dark room, with dim light, and then taught to remember their true allegiance.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            ·
            2 days ago

            Here’s what we know:

            A bunch of employees were in a discord server, organizing

            Many of those employees were fired

            How’s that not union busting?

            • dudeface@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              26
              ·
              2 days ago

              Not all Rockstar employees in that discord were fired, was only the ones leaking information

                • village604@adultswim.fan
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I’m not saying it’s a justification here, but the principle of least access is an important part of security best practices.

                  There are completely valid reasons to restrict what information can be shared.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is not a Discord issue specifically, a mole could also have infiltrated a chat on other platforms as well.

      This is a human issue first, a tech issue second

      • itsjustachairmary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fully agree. The bar to enter is very, very low and even then, do you trust everyone in there

        Anyway. Whoever the mole is, they’re a scab and they should be dealt with accordingly.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      How’s opsec going to help against a rat anyway? If an insider gives out information, you’re toast anyway, unless you have some kind of a cell network going on like some terrorist organizations and that’s, uh, a bit too much for organizing an union

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        OpSec includes vetting people and structuring your organization in a way that frustrates a rat’s ability to gain access to sensitive information.

        Having a structured internal network for the union isn’t “a bit much”, it’s a basic necessity to proper organization.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          And yet - if the people organizing are completely anonymous and you can’t even know for sure they’re your coworkers, would you trust them?

          • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            If you’re allowing anonymous people into your private server you have failed in your OpSec.

            The solution to this is to not allow anonymous people into a private server used for organizing. You vet them first before giving access. Basic OpSec 101.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Like saying how is a fire extinguisher going to help a house fire.

        Point is, good opsec prevents it from becoming a house fire.

      • vorpuni@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        SimpleX makes you anonymous and messages can’t be attributed to you. HR would probably believe screenshots still. If people identify themselves on the chat, and they don’t have to.

    • dmir@gehirneimer.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Seeing more governments salivating over chat control and banning VPNs, some even actively implementing these, I really dont’t think we’re seeing OPSEC being taught in schools or colleges.

      They used to tell us to be careful around the Internet, don’t use real names or give addresses or phone numbers or share any of our personal information online, to be cautios, to beware… now it’s all about “You dont’t have to worry if you don’t have anything to hide” and giving away all of your data voluntarily or being denied service until you do (or at least getting worse or more expensive service) and age verification.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t see how it’s some advanced technical process. It all comes down to the quandary of who to trust. If you don’t trust enough people, you don’t grow the movement. In this case, all it took was one figure to whom they overextended how much trust he was worth.

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        And that means there was a failure of OpSec in that it allowed someone untrustworthy access to sensitive information.

        A key part of OpSec is figuring out who to trust and how much of it they are extended.

    • ルルㇲ@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was taught in Elementary/Kindergarten.
      I had the privilege of being taught information security, programming, and OPSEC in a private school that no longer exists.
      See you at school board meetings.

  • sportsjorts@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ll wait 100 years till it comes out on gamepass. People who don’t play games keep talking to me about GTA6 and I don’t know what to say because I don’t care. Rockstar can forever eat my asd for not making red dead 2 zombies or multiplayer cool.

  • M137@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why repost this? It was posted so many times when it was news about two weeks ago and the whole week after.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because this feed is for everyone not just you so you are allowed to just skip the threads if you have already heard the news there’s no fucking perfect attendance award, sweaty