White House officials are bracing for oil prices to surge past the $150-a-barrel mark as the Iran war stretches into its second month and the Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed, according to a new report.

In recent weeks, the average cost of a barrel of crude has hovered around $100, a figure that the Trump administration now sees as the new “baseline,” though a potential spike to $200 hasn’t been ruled out, a source familiar with the matter told Politico.

As a result, officials have entered “all hands on deck” mode, urgently evaluating options to tame soaring oil prices — which pushed gas above $4 a gallon this week and risks inflating costs across the broader economy.

  • HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    If only in the decades since the oil embargo of the early 1970s we kept investing in alternative energy sources we could have been in a much better place energy wise.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Jimmy Carter put solar panels on the White House roof. Reagan took them down. Pretty succinct summary of the past 40 years.

      • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        before anyone says “those solar panels didn’t work very well” THAT’S NOT THE FUCKING POINT. they represented a commitment to invest in the technology. the presidency is the bully pulpit. a person can change a lot about the direction of the country there without making meaningful change in the moment. Grant and Carter are probably the two presidents who tried the hardest to do something positive with that power

        • Nate Cox@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Let’s not idolize Carter too much. I like a lot of what he did, and I obviously love his “old man building houses for the needy” golden years, but Carter was also the beginning of the dismantling of antitrust which is the primary reason we have wealth consolidation and market capture as the de facto norm today.

          He started the ball rolling with a bizarre policy of “big businesses are good for everyone” which meant antitrust laws–while still on the books and our official policy–simply stopped being enforced. Regan capitalized on this but Carter started it.

          • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            oh for sure. and Grant wasn’t great for indioenous people. America has never had a good president. just a limited selection who qualify for “most least worst”

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, but windmills cause cancer and solar is basically gay. And EVs - I’m pretty sure if you drive those when you are male, your penis shrivels up, falls off and you grow a vagina.

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Oh hey, maybe if they didn’t dismantle all the green energy and EV initiatives then the impacts would be mitigated a little bit…

    Funny how that works…

    • VinegarChunks@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Automakers have billions of dollars in brand new EV manufacturing equipment and lines sitting around doing nothing since the new administration changed all the regulations and incentives.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        they’re also putting some new programs on hold, so at least they’re not all outright cancelled yet

        but oh boy have a lot been cancelled. we built a huge cell that was shipped to the customer and scrapped the next year. the customer actually ended up taking apart the tools we built and shipping us back a bunch of the components to build them another cell for a different project. that was neat.

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Gotta subsidise the undead oil economy or else the old farts might actually have to read a journal and try to figure where else to invest the money they don’t need!

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      To be fair, once fuel prices go up the cost of EVERYTHING also goes up. So no it’s not just about pain at the pump, it’s pain at the grocery check out. Pain when the oil truck comes to deliver your liquid heat. Pain when you buy anything plastic, anything grown with fertilizers. People don’t realize petroleum is in almost everything! And if it doesn’t use a petroleum product in manufacturing, it certainly does in shipping.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      No one cares about victims of rape and pedophilia, that’s other people, caring about other people is un-American.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      When people are struggling to get by and exhausted from the news, they end up focusing on themselves. The reality is most Americans don’t have the energy, time, or resources to focus on something that’s disconnected from their lives - including attrocities on the other side of the planet.

      But gas prices hit HARD. When you’re spending 20-30% of your income on gas and the price of that gas doubles, it’s a problem even before it makes everything else skyrocket in price.

      • iegod@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        That excuse is honestly not acceptable. Americans have had ample time and opportunity to consider the impact of their voting decisions. This is their choice. Collectively, the country has failed.

        Too ignorant, selfish, or stupid.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      The only thing that keeps most people complacent is they can manage to scrape by with their meager salary buying crappy goods. Take that away and Americans might get more revolutionary.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    If ONLY Iran would OPEN up the Straight that was ALREADY Open BEFORE Trump bombed them for some Reason! WE wouldn’t be in This Mess! We NEED Trump to Fix Trump’s Fuck Up! Iran!

    -NOT Sheep Republicans!

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    I really want to see Iran say they’ll reopen it only after trump is personally handed over to stand trial for his war crimes…

    It will never work, but it’ll fracture his support and more importantly he’ll be ome convinced it’s gonna happen and start turning on his own cronies even if they’re loyal.

      • KC_Royalz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Except it’s going to devastate a lot of people financially who don’t deserve it. So ireally don’t find it funny.

        But if gas hits that high it will devastate rural areas and the people who voted for this

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          30% of the American public voted for these grifting idiots, not just the president, but his enablers too. This slightly disproportionately affects rural areas. We should be getting off of gas and investing in green energy anyway.

          I choose to laugh. It’s better than what the people of Iran got out of it.

          Man, I wonder if a better president would have come up with some kind of treaty to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              While that’s true, it doesn’t really contribute to the conversation or the problem at hand.

              Are you implying that because the US has nuclear weapons that you’d like Iran to have them too? Because that’s the only way I can relate this back.

              • spitfire@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                Remember those weapons over which US&A started the war in Iraq? They’ve probably existed as much as theirs in Iran. I don’t believe I’ve seen Iran attack anyone before it was attacked. US&A on the other hand…

                • Serinus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  I think you missed the point, which is that I think the way to handle this was Obama’s treaty before Trump dismantled it because it was an Obama accomplishment.

    • Kage520@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      They are bracing for the voters to finally turn on them. Commit fraud? It’s fine my gas is cheap. Sex with children? Eh whatever I don’t want to consider if that’s true or not as long as my gas is cheap. Bomb a school overseas? Whatever you’ve gotta do to keep my gas cheap. GAS PRICES ARE UP?! WTF IS THIS ADMINISTRATION DOING?! VOTE THEM OUT.

      It’s sickening, but it seems the price of gas is really all that matters to the Republican voter.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        This country has done nothing except wait for someone else to solve the “trump problem.” Protests are great to show unity and dissatisfaction, but I don’t think the regime cares. Protests are not force, and the only thing, if it isn’t obvious, this administration understands is abuse and use of force. They’d probably be fine with a Tiananmen Square scenario in the US, it would justify the final grab for power.

        That said, I hope you’re right and gas is finally enough to force change. Hopefully we don’t replace one idiot with another.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The Sociopathic Oligarchs see the Dow as the leading indicator of the economy, and never notice gas prices.

    But to the average American, the price of GAS is the leading economic indicator, and that number psychologically symbolizes the health of the economy in their minds. That number is displayed on every corner in the country, and every American passes it many times a day, driving it into their skulls.

    This is NOT good for MAGA, and a reckoning is coming. MAGA is feral, and when they feel cornered, wounded, and scared, they will strike out ferociously. It’s going to get uglier before it gets better.

  • protist@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The best part is that even if everything in the Strait were to return to normal tomorrow, the oil price shock is just barely beginning to filter through the system, so there’s absolutely nothing Trump can do to stop what he caused.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    They’re gonna nationalize our oil aren’t they? Required sale to the government at a set rate and then government will turn around and sell into the domestic and international markets to balance prices at our pumps.

    It’s about the only option other than stop bombing Iran and that’s not happening.

      • zarkony@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        That would bring the price of gas down here.

        I’m doubtful of that. Oil is a globalized commodity, and international prices will still affect local sales, even if none of our oil actually comes through the strait of Hormuz.

        I’m convinced the strait being closed is the whole point of this mess. It’s just an excuse to charge more despite local production costs not changing. If export were banned, I think they’d just lower production to keep their margins high.

        • VinegarChunks@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          The point is that banning the export of US oil would cause oil to stop being a globalized commodity (in the US.) US production and US consumption have not changed since the Iran war started. But US prices are up since US production is being shipped to places where their supply from Hormuz is cut off.

          Other responder said that US refining can’t refine US oil, which would be extremely odd and I hadn’t heard that before but if true would indeed destroy my logic here.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Oh Undoubtedly. I look forward to all the explanations as to why it’s Capitalism when we do it and Socialism when Venezuela does it.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    One idiotic move administration has made is to increase ethanol content of gasoline. Ethanol is corn based in US. Cost of corn is fertilizer based. The futures price of corn has only increased about 10%, while fertilizer costs are up 100%, and so no logical reason to plant corn that has been losing money for farmers for last 5 years.

    Easiest plan to bring down energy prices would be to import chinese solar tariff free, to use on ethanol corn fields in Nebraska. Leaving room for Corn between panel rows when it is viable to grow corn for food again. There’s even a path towards 0 cost electricity for 24/7 datacenters or other loads. https://lemmy.ca/post/59615557?scrollToComments=true

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Your linked AI slop post has a LOT of assumptions and it’s kinda expensive. If the total system capex is 50k for 1 kW load, it’ll be 500 million for a modern 10MW data center. Then covering the deficit off employee BEVs for peanuts a kWh: That assumes you have enough employees for that and that they’re willing to wear their batteries for this.

      But yes, the whole ethanol requirement is stupid for a country that has its own oil anyway