• 43 Posts
  • 1.47K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 4th, 2023

help-circle







  • If this is Linux, I’m pretty sure that you can use RandR (or whatever Wayland’s analog is, if this is Wayland) to crop the visible area to whatever aspect ratio you want. Probably on Wayland the wlr-randr command can do it on wlroots-based compositors.

    I’ve done so before on X11 with an HMD that extended into the edges of my visual field, where I wanted everything in the (crisp, clear) center.

    searches

    Looks like it:

    https://man.archlinux.org/man/wlr-randr.1.en

    --mode | --custom-mode     <width>x<height>[@<refresh>Hz]
    
    Set output resolution and, optionally, refresh rate.
    
    --pos <x>,<y>
    
    Position the output with absolute layout coordinates.
    

  • It doesn’t look like the article as a whole is downloadable without an account, but from what is accessible:

    The Commission identifies two threats as having extinction-potential:

    • The malicious use of artificial intelligence (AI)
    • Nuclear conflict

    I think that it’s reasonably likely that by 2100, we will have at least two other potential candidates (if we aren’t there already):

    • Engineered, self-replicating biological organisms that create pandemics or other situations problematic to human life (e.g. if we produced something like the Great Oxidation Event on a short timeframe). We are increasingly able to craft and modify life, and I would expect that we will explore all sorts of possibilities.
    • Self-replicating nanomachines that do similar; something like the gray goo scenario.

    In all cases other than nuclear conflict, I think that rapid replication that spirals out of control is the common factor that could render a risk existential.

    I also do not think that the most-likely existential risk from AI comes from intentional, malicious use—the article is specifically identifying malicious use—but from an error coupled with a system that can expand massively and spin out of control. Something more like the paperclip maximizer scenario.


  • Decompilation tools aren’t new, though AI might lower the bar in various ways.

    I don’t think that someone’s likely going to be able to successfully claim in courts that the decompiled work is free of copyright, as it’s a duplicate of the original (has substantial similarity) and directly replaces it; those are elements of infringement. A human can’t just sit down with a book and write a copy of it, word-by-word, and claim that they created the new book. They can read from a book and take influences from it, but not simply line-by-line copy it without infringing, and my expectation is that courts will probably treat an agentic AI doing so the same way as a human.

    I think that it’s probably mostly impactful in terms of ability to help analyze and defeat DRM systems, something that is technically-impactful, but not legally-impactful. Some DRM systems may just not be practical any more.


  • Yeah, I’ve had two pairs of DT 770 Pros now, and they’re probably my favorite non-active-noise-cancelling headphones. Good passive isolation, comfortable, fairly light, durable.

    I think that the cable used to be detachable and isn’t on current models, but my current model also cost significantly less, so…shrugs

    If OP wants ANC headphones, though, which I assume he does if he’s looking at Momentum 4s, might not be what he wants.










  • I’ve had a Momentum 4 and a WH-1000XM5.

    I was not happy with the Momentum, and can’t recommend it. I initially had some kind of connectivity problems with Linux. Then, it had a tendency to l cut out, which I eventually discovered was a problem with the infrared sensor in one cup used to detect whether you’ve taken the hesdphones off. When it fogs up with condensed sweat, apparently not enough IR light gets through and it thinks that you’ve taken the headphones off. I disabled that feature with the Android app. Then some problem came up where when moved slightly, it would play back loud, high-frequency “squeaky” sounds. Some sort of problem with the noise-cancelling setup. Oh, and I had problems with bumping the side triggering touch controls.

    The XM5 was fine for me when used as headphones—and better noise cancellation than the Momentum 4. But when used as a headset, sometimes, especially when resting my head against a chair, the other party would say that I suddenly became muffled.

    I currently use it as headphones, but pair it with a USB lapel mic when I need a mic.