White House officials are bracing for oil prices to surge past the $150-a-barrel mark as the Iran war stretches into its second month and the Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed, according to a new report.

In recent weeks, the average cost of a barrel of crude has hovered around $100, a figure that the Trump administration now sees as the new “baseline,” though a potential spike to $200 hasn’t been ruled out, a source familiar with the matter told Politico.

As a result, officials have entered “all hands on deck” mode, urgently evaluating options to tame soaring oil prices — which pushed gas above $4 a gallon this week and risks inflating costs across the broader economy.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I really want to see Iran say they’ll reopen it only after trump is personally handed over to stand trial for his war crimes…

    It will never work, but it’ll fracture his support and more importantly he’ll be ome convinced it’s gonna happen and start turning on his own cronies even if they’re loyal.

      • KC_Royalz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Except it’s going to devastate a lot of people financially who don’t deserve it. So ireally don’t find it funny.

        But if gas hits that high it will devastate rural areas and the people who voted for this

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          30% of the American public voted for these grifting idiots, not just the president, but his enablers too. This slightly disproportionately affects rural areas. We should be getting off of gas and investing in green energy anyway.

          I choose to laugh. It’s better than what the people of Iran got out of it.

          Man, I wonder if a better president would have come up with some kind of treaty to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 days ago

              While that’s true, it doesn’t really contribute to the conversation or the problem at hand.

              Are you implying that because the US has nuclear weapons that you’d like Iran to have them too? Because that’s the only way I can relate this back.

              • spitfire@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 days ago

                Remember those weapons over which US&A started the war in Iraq? They’ve probably existed as much as theirs in Iran. I don’t believe I’ve seen Iran attack anyone before it was attacked. US&A on the other hand…

                • Serinus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  I think you missed the point, which is that I think the way to handle this was Obama’s treaty before Trump dismantled it because it was an Obama accomplishment.

                  • spitfire@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    And while you’re talking about the point which is internal to US Politics you’re missing international one: not the first time that US&A started a war under false pretence, and now you’re pretty much on the same level as your friends: Israel and Russia.