Or just an apocalypse in general.

  • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Poorly.

    I could last a bit. We have outdoorsy supplies and can do without electricity, but it’s probably inevitable I’d just wind down or lose focus once and that’ll be that.

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I wouldn’t.

    These survivalist fantasies where people paint themselves as capable and not fodder…

    Hell, you outlast the outbreak/bomb you’ll probably die of sepsis the first time you get a bad cut or a tooth that goes rotten.

    If it is truly the apocalypse, you are best just letting go, because what follows after is like the end of night out at a club when they turn the lights on.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      … because what follows after is like the end of night out at a club when they turn the lights on.

      I always loved that bit when I used to go to the clubs, because I was aces at swimming between all the drunks.

      Not all us are helpless.

      Infections are a real risk, yeah, but I’ve literally some antibiotics in my fridge, don’t even remember where from. Sure they’re expired and for specifically I think ear/nose/mouth infections, but they’d be of some help. Also I have the basics of mycology down, so making my own antibiotics wouldn’t be out of the question. Would it be risky, and entail lots of shitting my guts out? Probably. But if it was an apocalypse scenario and I had a bad infection, I’d take my chances. Penicillin is quite common.

      I’ve also other medical supplies like large expensive-ish covers/pads for surgery wounds from my elbow surgery, they gave me extra ones as I had to keep it clean at home (and by extra I mean extra not ones I was supposed to use but in case I fucked it up etc) and general first aid kit ofc.

      I’ve also 25 liters of fresh water, just in case, and a car with a full tank of gas, a freezer full of food, would last me months, plus the dry stuff in the pantry. Weapons, not really. Lots of knives ofc, not kitchen knives, but puukko, Finnish knives. From a pretty much pvp version that’s almost a small sword, to small whittling ones. (Got my first one at four from my grandpa, proper puukko from Lappi.) Got some mace, a foldable shovel that also functions as an ax. And a very small poundage bow. (You could perhaps hurt people with it with good arrows but honestly it’s a teenagers practice bow, more for the psychological factor I think.)

      Besides all that, I also served a year in the military, where I went to officer training for supply logistics. Meaning everything you need to keep fighting fit, aside from medical assistance. Supplies, guns, bullets, clothing, water and especially food. So we were also taught how to slaughter and butcher various animals, and how to be relatively sure that what you’re eating and drinking isn’t going to kill you. (We also drilled a well in -20c by hand when the ground was literally frozen solid. Had to 6m deep iirc or was it even 8.) Also how warm you need to be, how much water you need daily. From all the basics from “don’t shit near where you make food” to more complex shit, like which bacteria live in which temp and what it takes to kill them.

      So you know. You might let go, but I wouldn’t. I’m no prepper, and in fact find them rather comical. However I do live about 300km from the Russian border, so I don’t think any of this is in any way fantastical or even highly improbable.

      I mean I don’t plan to crash a car when I’m in one, but I (almost) always use a seatbelt. Doesn’t mean I’m fantasising about crashes. But I have survived several though, so.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Not only I wouldn’t survive I would be that stupid character that makes the beloved character die because their idiocracy :3

  • Triumph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Water, shelter, food, security. Everything is viewed through the lens of those priorities, in order.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      This is the answer. Most people won’t survive the long term breakdown of society for long, and the “preppers” will probably be some of the first to go, as they will fight each other, become targets, and generally have a more antagonistic approach to survival. The people who stand the best chance will be the ones focused on collaboration and community building. But even then, surviving the initial collapse will be more about luck than intent.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think that one of the major problems isn’t even the zombies as such, but the collapse of infrastructure that we rely on to maintain our current populations. Transportation and associated trade. Electrical power. Fuel. Fertilizer.

      Like, even if you omitted zombies from the equation and took those away, the population that could be supported is probably a whole lot lower than the present population. Pre-industrial societies were not very populous compared to current ones.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrying_capacity

      The carrying capacity of an ecosystem is the maximum population size of a biological species that can be sustained by that specific environment, given the food, habitat, water, and other resources available. The carrying capacity is defined as the environment’s maximal load,[clarification needed] which in population ecology corresponds to the population equilibrium, when the number of deaths in a population equals the number of births (as well as immigration and emigration)

      Human carrying capacity is a function of how people live and the technology at their disposal. The two great economic revolutions that marked human history up to 1900—the agricultural and industrial revolutions—greatly increased the Earth’s human carrying capacity, allowing human population to grow from 5 to 10 million people in 10,000 BCE to 1.5 billion in 1900.[47] The immense technological improvements of the past 100 years—in applied chemistry, physics, computing, genetic engineering, and more—have further increased Earth’s human carrying capacity, at least in the short term. Without the Haber-Bosch process for fixing nitrogen, modern agriculture could not support 8 billion people.[48] Without the Green Revolution of the 1950s and 60s, famine might have culled large numbers of people in poorer countries during the last three decades of the twentieth century.[49]

  • RustyShackleford@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    As I’ve grown older, survival has become a burden. I’ve decided to embrace chaos by traveling in my shark suit and detonating any reactors I encounter. I’ve always been a morally upright person, so I believe I deserve to sought a little chaos in my life.

    • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Trash Can Man? Donald? Donald Merwin Elbert? Is THAT you?

      Ok, he didn’t detonate them on purpose

  • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Highly unlikely that anyone would actually “survive” a zombie apocalypse. It’s more a question of how long you’d last, and for the vast majority of people that would be just days.

    For example, if you live in a major city, it’s highly unlikely you’d have enough supplies at home to wait out the initial chaos. Heading to the supermarket to fist-fight over a can of beans, or going to the gas station, is exactly what everyone else is doing too - and that’s where you either get killed by a panicking human or bitten by the infected.

    Even if you had the foresight to stock enough supplies to bunker down in your apartment for a few weeks (by far the safest place for you to be), you’d still be trapped inside a city full of the walking dead. The odds could not be more stacked against you.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I actually live on the outskirts of a city, in the intersection of major motorways and a walking distance from the small but interactions airport we have. As in I regularly take walks which go within a stones throw of the airport area and I’ve been in the back buildings they have there, fucking around with old lockers and the airplane stairs they’d use to use and whatnot. (Free clay balls for my gardening hobby as well dumped in a pile there, clearly abandoned.)

      And I’m pretty sure I could manage to get Cessna sized plane up, I’ve played enough simulators.

      Everyone here is so negative about all of this. I’d have much better chances at a life worth living than I do in this bureaucratic hellscape. Not really, probably, because once the convenience of everything gets taken away, it seems way less fun. But yeah not everyone is in the same situation. One of the other commenters was a trucker in, I assume, the US. That’s a mobile apartment with torque enough to drive through any zombies. That guy isn’t stuck in a city.

    • Lemmywinks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I dunno, I’m pretty sure you’d only have to hold out for the few days it would take for the birds/ants/etc to eat through the major tendons on all the zombies, rendering them immobile, and then you’d be completely safe and the massive clean-up project could begin.

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Unless anything magical/sci fi like in dead island going on i doubt there is enough food to support them for long. My guess is most run out of calories in 2 weeks. Then it gets to manageable levels.

      • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        We’re talking about zombies here - they’re fictional, magical creatures that laws of nature don’t apply to. If it did, we wouldn’t have zombies in the first place.

        Zombies don’t have heartbeat, don’t eat, drink or sleep. They decay extremely slowly and can only be killed by destroying the brain.

        • Lemmywinks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Sure, the birds/ants/etc aren’t going to kill the zombies, but without any tendons the zombies aren’t going to pose much of a threat.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wizard Island is a 5 hour drive. Deep freshwater lake, surrounded by water on all sides. Fish. In a volcanic crater so any zombies coming have to summit the volcano first, then be visible on the rim before getting to the water, where they sink.

    • IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      My biggest concern would be the zombies contaminating the water with whatever virus/poison/venom that makes zombies. Even if they’re visible, the moment they touch water, I’d already be scared to drink.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I think that in general, the problem with water barriers is that they work well on humans, who need to breathe. But, depending upon the type of zombie universe in question, zombies may not. They may be able to just walk along the bottom.

      EDIT: And one other complication for the zombie apocalypse survivor who wants to set up near large, accessible sources of freshwater:

      https://www.stratcom.mil/Portals/8/Documents/FOIA/CONPLAN_8888-11.pdf

      HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES STRATEGIC COMMAND

      CDRUSTRATCOM CONPLAN 8888 "COUNTER-ZOMBIE DOMINANCE 30 APR 2011

      b. (U) Operational COG #2: Potable water sources (PWS)

      i. (U) Zombies do not drink water, but humans do. Humans typically cannot survive longer than 10 days without fresh water. Zombies will likely be drawn to potable water sources by the presence of human food sources that zombies prey on.

  • STUNT_GRANNY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Driving (and living in) an 18-wheeler, I’ve got shelter and transportation already sorted. Got all the comforts of home on board. Enough food and water to last a couple weeks, maybe a month if I had to. I can carry enough fuel to drive ~2500 miles if I ditched my trailer, or to run my APU for nearly a year in “standby” mode. Sure, replacing that fuel once it’s gone would be tricky, but it’s a diesel. There are plenty of alternative fuel sources out there.

    I suppose my plan would be to run away from civilization, but off the beaten path so as to not get stuck in the mother of all traffic jams. No need to go that far; a few dozen, maybe a couple hundred miles down a non-interstate highway should be sufficient to avoid most humans/zombies. Plenty of random warehouses and parking lots out in the middle of nowhere.

    Then it’d be a matter of relaxing for a few weeks, keeping my head down, and listening to the radio for any news about a safe zone or what have you.

  • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I believe it’s generally accepted that zombies can’t climb, or at least, they are really bad at it. So you basically just need to take the high ground. If you can get up a ladder or something, you would basically be safe and could easily pick off any zombies below with a spear or other ranged weapon.

    Long term, I would probably go to the mountains, find a clean water source and plant crops. The mountainous terrain would be a big obstacle and most zombies probably wouldn’t even try to go up. For any that do, I could probably set up some traps to lead them off an edge where they would fall back to the bottom.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Mountains. I’ve never even seen one in real life. :( (It always fucking gets me when Bilbo goes “MOUNTAINS I want to see mountains again” so wistful looking)

      I’d probably have to go on an island.

      We’ve got the most in the world, iirc, 50 000 - 80 000 small islands.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Form a citizen militia, go door to door and instruct people to start making spears out of what ever parts we can obtain. Train to fight in a formation.

    Picks and shovels, construct earthworks to defend against a siege. Hold them out, funnel them into killing zones.

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      This is something that killed walking dead for me. There was a whole thing where they’re in the prison and the zombies outside manage to mass up enough that they break the fence. If they took shifts, 4 hrs a day with a spear and head stabbed the zombies they would never have gotten to a critical mass.

      Infact, I did the math years ago for my ideal zombie escape zone. It would only take 8 people and a month to effectively eliminate the entire regional population if we move in 4 hour shifts. So baring the entire nearest metropolitan city showing up at once with a psychic level awareness of our presence and a deep need for revenge, all you really need is consistency and a schedule.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yep, and surely most people are capable of killing >1 zombie unless they get pretty unlucky. You can only turn into 1 zombie when you fail.