• Shamber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Isn’t she AI generated herself? I didn’t think it was possible to be that awful both as an actor and as a human, and yet here we are

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Yeah, that’s not career suicide at all. She’ll be working with The Daily Wire next.

    • KnitWit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      8 days ago

      I mean, can you name a movie she’s been in since Wonder Woman? Literally the last thing I can remember from her was the video of she put out during covid of celebrities looking for attention.

      • FluidBeef@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        8 days ago

        She did some of those fake streaming blockbusters that no-one you know has ever watched or even heard of.

        • KnitWit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          8 days ago

          Haha, I did forget that one. Was it snow white? I remember hearing it didn’t do very well.

          • Thorry@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            8 days ago

            The only reason I heard about that movie is because it was so terrible and specifically Gal Gadot was called out for not being able to act at all and having sung a song whilst not being able to sing as well.

  • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m trying to decide if the acting would be worse if it was the real Gal Gadot or an AI version…

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    8 days ago

    I cannot wait for this to become a huge critical and commercial failure. It has the potential to give AI the massive setback it deserves.

  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    8 days ago

    English people in 19th century China: Opium is inevitable. You’re going to work with it or be left out of the game entirely.

  • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    The change towards AI entertainment is inevitable, I for once can’t wait for all that low quality crap that is release every year to be fully-AI so I can filter it out, and stuff with real artistic merit and passion becomes easier to find

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 days ago

      stuff with real artistic merit and passion becomes easier to find

      How so? Because there’s going to be 10x more slop out there, none of it labeled as slop. And every safe space you have now will be invaded by slop pretending to be made by real people.

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        The cool thing is, once it’s shown there is no market for abstract, disjointed, unhuman stories, everyone who is trying to push and normalize this will move on to the next carcass and try to feed or go back to selling stars or whatever.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          And so will the slop, because people will label things as whatever gets more eyeballs.

          • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            you are thinking about tiktok hashtags or whatever, because that’s not how databases work, they aren’t made for clickbait and are maintained by turbonerds

    • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      so I can filter it out, and stuff with real artistic merit and passion becomes easier to find

      I got bad news for ya

      • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        only if you don’t know the lengths I go through to make my lists nor how familiar I am with movie/series databases :)

      • MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Worst case scenario, I’ll just decide on a cutoff date (probably somewhere between 2021 and 2029) and focus on stuff created before that date, which will contain almost all of the man-made media and none of the genAI slop.

        There is a ton of really cool stuff I heard about for me to go through anyway. Video games alone should last me well past the Hayflick limit (hard limit for a human lifetime unless radical life extension breakthroughs happen). To say nothing of movies/anime, books/comics/manga, crafts, causes, etc…

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      8 days ago

      I hope my ai agent can learn what I like and give me suitable recommendations based on that.

      Part if why ai is so overvalued is companies don’t value my time. Slop won’t fix that. I’m hooeful that ai agents allow us to filter out the junk we don’t want. No more waiting on hold. No made searching online for deals and product reviews. Just agents parsing data that we want.

      For entertainment, there was a shift when we moved from broadcast to digital as we could binge and not miss episodes. The rise of reality TV muddied the waters of quality and was the equivalent of ai slop. However those that preferred, avoided it.

      Of course that won’t be automatic. We’re going to need open models, open training data and a great FOSS ecosystem around personal agents. We also need to make sure that the means of compute don’t fall out of people’s hands.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I hope my ai agent can learn what I like and give me suitable recommendations based on that.

        lol, no. It will learn what you like, sell that information to advertisers and governments, and then give you recommendations based on what the AI’s billionaire owners want you to watch.

        • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          That’s what i told my friend when they mentioned that their clanker recommended the most expensive stuff when asked. Sure, the top result from google will be given the priority, but when parameters can sneakily be adjusted to favour people who paid them, then we will never know what being recommended is an ad or not.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yes, with openai, or Google. That’s why I hope we can move more to FOSS agents. Currently, big tech uses our data against us to try and manipulate us.

          With big data processing being more available, things like price checking and review checking can be automated. The problem is its always cat and mouse. Browser extensions started by finding you discount codes and automatically entering them. Then they started to mine your data and swap referral codes to theirs as they enshittified.

          LLM’s are here to stay nut they are not groundbreaking in the way businesses hope, replacing workers. They are useful in replacing tasks. They are just not consistently good at those tasks. They shift the cognitive effort in many cases. Well, we should use them to shift the effort back onto corporations.

      • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Oh boy, did that rub everyone the wrong way.

        Either way, you could have your own LLM agent and run it locally. That way your recommendations wouldn’t be steered towards greatest quarterly revenue. Instead, it would be something that actually serves your purposes.

        • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Either way, you could have your own LLM agent and run it locally

          Ignoring everything else, that wouldn’t work. Your local llm instance, to recommend you new movies, would have to scour the internet to summarize information about them.

          Boom, thats the vector of it getting steered towards greatest quarterly revenue.

          • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yeah that’s true. Search results, movie reviews and blogs definitely can be used to steer it in any direction. You just need to keep the LLM on a very short leash and keep a close eye on its diet. Takes some effort to do this properly.

            • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 days ago

              That defeats the purpose then.

              If the goal is to say “hi, my local LLM, recommend me a new movie that I like, because god forbid I’ll take a risk and grow”, then you having to curate the data feed going into LLM to describe new movies is in practice this:

              • you’ll have to find sources of data (websites, threads, communicties)
              • verify each and everyone for poisoning BEFORE adding to your deterministic vectorization (see what Netflix did for recommendation algorithm recently) and applying custom LLM-like in architecture model.

              Tl;dr;

              Either you can use LLM and will be steered towards greatest quarterly revenue OR you have to put the same effort as if reading all reviews from multiple sources by yourself

              And in both cases you still end up with the same outcome “maybe you’ll like it” :P

              • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                Unless there are community based information sources. Adblock works mainly by blacklisting. Foss agents could use a combination of blacklisting and whitelisting in the same way. Yes, it takes effort, but spread over a community, it’s minimal. In the days before internet, it meant buying a magazine or newspaper. There has always been a certain amount of effort to find reviews, other than word of mouth, which will continue.

        • Salvo@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Or even better, don’t be lazy and curate your own interests.

          My high school motto was “Faber Quisque Fortunae” (each man creates their own destiny). That means that You need to take responsibility for your own actions and decisions. You don’t outsource living.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Curating your own interests involves some aapect of information seeking. Llms can be used for that. It’s not a case that anyone should trust ai to make a decision. It’s that ai can help surface information to allow them to make a decision. The problem is too many people are letting the ai make a decision for them, or using it instead of other information that is better.

            • Salvo@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Most of the raw information has been deliberately obfuscated in with malicious ads.

              If we were able to dismantle the toxic malicious web advertising apparatus, we wouldn’t need them. At all!

              • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                That’s a problem that precedes llms. There used to be information online but it was normally informed. Since the social web, blogs, reviews, business reviews, Google reviews etc etc are packed so full of junk and nonsense that they are unhelpful.

                The hope of the internet was to make information available to all. Spread ideas. Instead we as a species spread vapid half thoughts that drowns out the useful. LLMs are an extension of that and likely will make it much worse. But they can also be used to filter it.

                The question is who decides which data is accurate and how do we verify that with these black boxes that are poorly understood by most of us.

  • im_fine_sandy@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 days ago

    Fuck I miss the time when I could just watch a movie and think “ooh that actress is hot”, without having to consider their position on Israel or crypto.

  • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    She is an Israeli agent, wouldn’t expect anything less from her. Of course she would consider lives and contributions of others too be less valuable.

  • davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 days ago

    Incredible. I chuckled at that first paragraph for being extreme satire. Then read the rest.

    It’s just not possible to outdo reality anymore.