I believe China tries to somehow argue its not imperialistic, its multipolar, which honestly is just a spit in the face.
(A very good critique of multipolarism from a far, far far left source can be found here: https://spectrejournal.com/against-multipolar-imperialism/)
A carney mentalist who became a sex pope?
What did he lose?
Hanging out alone with out a child at a playground sure
Here in Poland playgrounds are often extended with a public outdoor gym or something similar. That solves all problems, making them social centers for both child-free and parents.
E.g.
With fenced playground:
And no fence anywhere
You assume correctly.
.net runtime after 10 months of using and measuring where LLMs (including latest Claude models) shine reported a mindboggling success rate peaking at 75% (sic!) for changes of 1-50 LOC size - and it’s for an agentic model (so you give it a prompt, context, etc, and it can run the codebase, compile it, add tests, reason, repeat from any step, etc etc).
Except it was clearly bullshit because it didn’t work.
Welcome to the LLMs where everything is hallucinated and correctness doesn’t matter.
Is anyone having success with these tools
Define success.
Is there a special way to prompt it?
It gets better the more you use it, you will learn what works for you, and what does not. Right now the hot shit is “autonomous agent swarms” peddled by the token sellers as a way to output correct massive features. Do not touch that for now.
What helps with Claude / llms 101:
when it tells you something about an API, using a tool or whatever, tell it tool version and order it to give you documentation page proving the solution is possible.
when it oneshots a working solution you will get a dopamine hit. Be aware of that, as it can be addictive or make you trust it. Do not trust it, it sucks long term.
it will alwyas default to below average solution. Know where your hotspots are, and be extra judgy there.
it will get lazy and lie to you, especially with tests
it will not propose code refactors on its own.
despite the token peddlers claims, no matter if your using the 1M token context window model, the shit degrades when the context window is over 20k-30k tokens - so switch context windows often for better outcomes, but that means you will be burning more money - which obviously benefits the token peddlers.
do not trust the hype - so far any and all tall claim of a breakthrough from the token peddlers were a lie (e.g. vibing working os that can run Doom, vibing a next.js 96% replacement in a week, vibing a browser, compiler, vibing a browser jailbreak via Mythos)
Would I get better results during certain hours of the day?
Afaik USA timezone has worse performance.
It’s not an option in Search.
Bots aggressively scrapping everything they can.
So far any technical blog that Antrophic made regarding their new capabilities was a marketing lie (e.g. agents clean room implementing c compiler without human intervention - turns out the only true part of that was that the agents did burn tokens, but it was neither clean room, nor without human intervention, it didn’t compile and it needed to use the actual compiler to copy paste working code [sic!]). I am not convinced the Mythos one is different.