Dazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 10 days agoNot wronglemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1802arrow-down12
arrow-up1800arrow-down1imageNot wronglemmy.dbzer0.comDazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 10 days agomessage-square49linkfedilink
minus-squaredalekcaan@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·10 days agoYeah, that’s why I prefer cubic cows. They’re much easier to pack, too.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·9 days agoEfficiently packing 17 square cows.
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 days agoThis is the Superwaffle Debacle all over again! flips syrup table and leaves
minus-squareotter@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 days agoCertainly easier to get a proper angle on 'em.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 days agoI can’t believe we’re having this argument again. Hexagonal cows when two dimensional. Uh, regular icosahedral cows in three, I don’t know the names of the shapes in four but you’ll put your eye out
Yeah, that’s why I prefer cubic cows. They’re much easier to pack, too.
Efficiently packing 17 square cows.
This is the Superwaffle Debacle all over again!
flips syrup table and leaves
I do not like this
Certainly easier to get a proper angle on 'em.
I can’t believe we’re having this argument again. Hexagonal cows when two dimensional. Uh, regular icosahedral cows in three, I don’t know the names of the shapes in four but you’ll put your eye out