Hi there everyone,
Let me start this by saying that this is an honest question. I figure nobody would be better suited to answer my question than a group laser-focused on the negatives of the technology.
I see these types of memes a lot and see statistics of gallons consumed in a lot of articles I read. What I don’t understand though is where the water goes that it can’t be reclaimed or naturally return from a gas to a liquid.
As a kid(long ago), I was taught of the cycle of rain and the conversion between gases and liquid. It’s my understanding that when a liquid is used to cool something, it also follows the same conversion process as it cools.
Could someone explain to me what’s going on in this process where the 264 billion gallons of water used in the meme do not return to a liquid state?
I would appreciate any insight into the process that seems to defy this cycle that I am missing. Like I said prior, my knowledge of this process ended in middle school science class so I’m confident that I’m missing something.
Thanks for your time!
Future historians? LOL… after this blunder, mankind is going right back to the 18th Century and they’ll be bitches in the fields again or starve.
First of all, in general it depends what kind of water is used - river, lake, ground water - but in this case it’s almost always easily accessible river and lake water, because it’s the cheapest (surprise, surprise).
This is actually much better than it would have been with underground aquifers, because those take long years to refill.
However, whenever you collect river or lake water and evaporate it, it’ll almost never return as rain in the exact same place. Partially because that’s just how it works, and partially because climate change is affecting rain patterns almost everywhere.
So if you quickly use up half of an entire river - a good amount of the water will return as rain, but away from the river, so the river will still shrink. This is bad, because ecosystems depend on rivers and lakes, including people. It also doesn’t mean new rivers or lakes will be created elsewhere. All our current lakes and rivers have been created over millenia. Depending on where all that extra rain falls - the water may not even have a positive impact, e.g., because it’ll cause a flood.
Depending on the specific geographic location, some of the water may be completely wasted, because the rain will fall into the sea. In the middle of the country (US) it’s pretty much 0%, but closer to the shore it may be nearing 100%.
There’s also the problem of some data centers ignoring ecological regulations, and dumping all kinds of waste into the same rivers they use for cooling. There was at least one case of an xAI data center seriously polluting a river.
The single biggest issue is just the scale of water extraction. Most of humanity’s water use has been slowly growing over thousands of years, with appropriate infrastructure built and ecological research conducted. Not exactly true in the US (go figure), but I’m simplifying.
Big cities obviously use a lot of water, too. But they were built and populated over up to 300 years (or much more outside North America).
Now imagine adding several big citties worth of water consumption, all in just a few years, without any ecological oversight.
Excellent write up. Thank you for putting in the effort, this really helps.
There was at least one case of an xAI data center seriously polluting a river.
Wait, same xAI that was using methane generators to run their datacenters in Tennessee, right?
It almost seems like destroying the planet is their actual goal and if they’re lucky they generate petabytes of generated CSAM and “Mecha Hitler” as a treat.
Hello I’ve used this as an example video in the past, I occasionally work on cooling towers and usually the maintance is not always the best, so I can’t imagine what they’re doing since it’s kinda hush hush for people working on them so I can’t give information on exactly how their systems work but evaporative is pretty common and air chilled sites are something I come across too but not as often as evaporative[Evaporative cooling tower](Evaporative cooling tower https://youtu.be/dg4L_xdaIIs)
When the water evaporates it leaves behind the minerals so it builds up quick. There’s maintance that you have to do on them and depending on the place there are regular water changes since the minerals build up. Places that have hard water I would assume change more often plus there is legionnaires from the water too since it’s a good environment for bacteria and other shit. Which can also get put into the air as droplets and assuming you have a humid day it could also make the workers or people near sick. Plus water usage can vary since maintance is not always top priority for companies so a bad float valve can passively just dump water back into the city system
Funny enough the towers in this video have been replaced with newer ones, that also leaked out of the sides xD
deleted by creator
The 264 billion gallons absorb enough energy from the data center to evaporate. They turn into a gaseous form and rise into the sky where they become clouds. The clouds will eventually precipitate and turn into rain, but it might take months and months, and it probably won’t happen in dry areas with low rainfall. It might even happen over the ocean, turning the clouds into undrinkable salty seawater.
It might even happen over the ocean, turning the clouds into undrinkable salty seawater.
Well, I mean, doesn’t water evaporate from the ocean constantly and then also become rain?
To be clear it’s still a huge problem due to redistribution issues especially in drought stricken areas, but I feel like the ocean is actually like the main source of freshwater precipitation globally, right?
Sure, but we don’t usually use rain for drinking. It first has to pass through the ground and be pumped up.
The problem is that data centers are basically skipping the one step where humans have access to the water.
I think they’re using potable drinking water too. So we pay for it to be treated before data centers use it.
Why.
Edit: yes I know, the reason is that it costs more money
If you want to have water evaporated, you want it to not contain too much gunk otherwise your “evaporation pot” will get muddy real quick (not defending ai, just giving their rational)
Water has to be balanced before being pumped through the facility, or it will corrode or calcify the piping. DCs use municipal water so they don’t have to cover the cost of balancing themselves.
I don’t think the amount of evaporation from the ocean increases based on how much water is in the ocean at a proportional rate.
Probably not, but we’re in luck! As data centers accelerate climate change we’ll get more evaporation as the average ocean temperature continues to climb
Not to mention the oceans cover 2/3 the surface of Earth, so any precipitation only has a 1/3 chance of being on land. And then of course as others have mentioned that doesn’t mean it will rain in an accessible area or where it is most needed.
You want a hurricane? That’s how you get hurricanes
plus whatever anti-corosives and other [[accumulating] forever[?]] chemicals added that remain
I always assumed that distilled water (water turned to vapour, and re-condensed) is purified in the process.
The issue is that even when data centers don’t evaporate the water completely, their waste water has a much higher concentration of contaminants (because a bunch of the water evaporated out, concentrating everything that doesn’t evaporate). This makes it undrinkable.
That depends on how it’s recondensed. For distilled water you need a sterile collector.
Fine, I’ll do it.
I’m a bit uneducated on this, so maybe its a dumb question… But couldn’t saltwater be used for cooling as well? We have desalination plants, I’m sure there has gotta be a way to use the water for cooling and eliminate the freshwater problem completely, right? I’m assuming it is just that they don’t want to spend more money?
Salt water is really hard on plumbing. At best it could be used as a secondary cooling loop.
I’m assuming it is just that they don’t want to spend more money?
It’s always this.
Saltwater is corrosive so it would cost more to maintain.
Desalination takes a lot of energy. In order to use seawater without rusting the pipes, they’d need to make even more CO2.
Desalinization is a very costly process, so you would do it only if there are really no other alternatives. If if you can’t get cheaper in other ways
It evaporates. They could cool it back down and reuse it, but that would increase costs even more and corporations like money.
Also, “but it remains part of the water cycle” is irrelevant. Of fucking course it does; we’re not talking about nuclear fusion here! But what matters isn’t how much water exists, it’s how much usable water exists and when it evaporates it stops being usable.
Isn’t the same true for nuclear power plants?
yes but we get value from power plants - power.
LLMs just suck up more power.
Yes, or anything with evaporative cooling towers. (Coal-fired plants have them too, because they’re associated with the steam turbine part, not the nuclear part.)
However, it should be wasting a lot less water (relative to the benefit) since the whole point is to extract as much energy from the steam as possible before it exits the turbine. Power plants have the “excuse” that if they tried to cool the steam any further they’d have to spend power to do it, which would reduce overall efficiency and thus be self-defeating.
Nah, they ran out of water because they found a way to make money with it.
Pray they don’t find a way to use oxygen or we’ll have PerriAIR from spaceballs
As a kid (long ago), I was taught of the cycle of rain and the conversion between gases and liquid. It’s my understanding that when a liquid is used to cool something, it also follows the same conversion process as it cools.
Yeah the water used in evaporative cooling on the data canter roofs does later condense as rain somewhere again, but the issue is that it will be far away from the location by then, so that’s no relief for the local water network that is taxed by the demand.
To tack onto this; For recondensing the water you also need a cold area, if you’ve got a heat source such as thousands of computers worth of cooling towers and hundreds of diesel/gas turbine generators running in one spot, you’ve got a recipe for a hot, humid patch of atmosphere in the area surrounding the datacenter which can hold a lot of water and take it away fron the area.
Do this enough times in one country and it creates a heat dome of hot humid air made of their drinking water, combine that with global rising temperatures and any human or animal body in the area becomes physically incapable of shedding any heat because the outside temperature and humidity prevents their sweat from evaporating.
https://www.joburgetc.com/news/ai-data-centers-fresh-water-usage-cooling-recycled/
TLDR: They use evaporative cooling, so the clean drinking water is taken from the water supply and distributed to the air. Yes, the rain cycle works and the water isn’t destroyed, but the water molecules are distributed places that are no longer readily available. Drinking water supplies like aquifers, reservoirs, etc. are depleted, but weather patterns do not necessarily replenish them, particularly weather patterns distorted by climate change.
Hahaha, future historians. Rich.
You’re right about the rain and evaporation in general. It’s the rate of evaporation and source of water that is in question.
This is a simple answer and there’s a lot of factors but generally, it’s the rate of usage.
Farms in California are facing drought - the water cycle hasn’t stopped, but the water source in the mountains is drying up as climate change impacts are felt - so they extract groundwater (which is not replaced at the rate of extraction). This groundwater evaporates or leaves inside the vegetables they grow and falls as rain but not where it was extracted from.
A datacentre in Wisconsin pulls water from a Great Lake, is used for cooling, the water evaporates, and rains somewhere else. The Great Lake shrinks. It’s the same effect.
Plus, the water may be treated (contaminated) by the datacentre. It may be using treated drinking water.
Copying from another thread on this, but the focus on water use over electricity and emissions of datacenters does not make sense. It’s just helping datacenter by focusing on the wrong environmental issue because they are not a major contributor to water use.
Agriculture, and animal agriculture specifically, are the super dominant water users. Even in water scarce places like the Colorado river
Animal agriculture also pollutes ground water, and at a far higher rate and frequency. They create toxic algae blooms are from the runoff which means high nitrate levels in the local water level. Cancer rates are elevated nearby animal farms
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935126006286
Meanwhile electrical usage is delaying fossil fuel plant closure, leading to new ones, leading to backup generator use, etc. Datacenters are projected to go from 5% of electricity use to 15%. I keep seeing 5x the number of posts on the water usage than emissions. It’s letting datacenters get away with their super high emissions with so much less attention to it
Yeah but Agriculture produces stuff we actually need instead of automating people’s jobs and child porn
Though not all agriculture is equal. We don’t need to be eating nearly so much meat, dairy, and so on though. Per capita consumption has gone through the roof in previous decades. If we are concerned about water, we should also be also reducing our consumption. For a number of other reasons too
You are right but I find it quite hard to raise arguments against cattle raising when the animals existing allow for a better outcome than if they didn’t.
An objective example: I’ve recently read a paper on how two landrace breeds, one of sheep and one of cows, are more effective at preventing wild fires than conventional cleaning efforts through the use of machinery to manage vegetation. The animals selectively eat vegetation that is usually source of ignition or facilitates fast spread of fire, reach areas where machines can not go and do not destroy the landscape. Apparently there are good indicators that the grazing may even lead to soil improvement and more biodiversity.
Regardless, there are people trying to remove these animals from the landscape. I don’t agree. Better to have animals roaming around, living their lives, than burning fuel to try and make a poor work at cleaning what otherwise are abandoned tracts of land and then have wild fires destroying everything in they path, often caused by malicious human hand.
The better approach for those cases is to let the wild grazers back into the land. Cattle and other modern farm animals don’t graze like wild life did
Cows and bison differ in all behaviors — including how they stand, move and graze. Cattle spend almost double the time grazing — 45-49 percent — in comparison to bison — who spend just over a quarter of their time doing so (26-28 percent).
[…]
The types of plants bison and cattle prefer to graze on are also remarkably different. Unlike cattle, who prefer to graze steadily on flowering herbs like clover, milkweed and sunflower, free-roaming bison cover a much larger area, grazing on different varieties of grass, such as perennial grasses, but leaving certain areas of the prairie untouched.
https://sentientmedia.org/cattle-ranching-terrible-for-biodiversity/
Moreover in the net, having cattle on those is usually a net negative to the ecosystem
Livestock farmers often claim that their grazing systems “mimic nature”. If so, the mimicry is a crude caricature. A review of evidence from over 100 studies found that when livestock are removed from the land, the abundance and diversity of almost all groups of wild animals increases
There are no wild grazers here. Closest to it are wild boars and a few introduced deers. I’m in Portugal. Old country. We had a large number of landraces, adapted to specific locations, mostly bred for free range grazing and foraging but the commercial breeds nearly wiped them out.
If we assume that’s true, this still leaves the emission side of things which are quite high for cattle. Cattle are some of the heaviest emitters because of how they digest. Are we at least in agreement that the production level and thus consumption level should come down?
We do.
I still remember meat being treated as a speciality dish, not a daily presence. And the animals were allowed to grow slowly. Herds were smaller. The most affordable meats were normally rabbit, chicken and pidgeon, all animals most people raised at home.
Industrial farming is a monstrosity.
Worth noting that generating electricity is typically the second leading user of water behind agriculture. A 5 -> 15 percent bump will consume a lot more water unless new generation doesn’t spin a turbine with steam, just not at the data center itself.
That’s much more of a fair argument than the cooling loop water that I haven’t heard articulated. Keeping the old fossil fuel plants alive does keep that water use there. That being said, the majority of the new grid capacity is solar and wind which are the two types of power generation that don’t need to really use steam. Was about 88% solar + wind in 2025 capacity additions in the US and 91% from solar + wind + battery in Q1 2026
It evaporates in cooling. A closed loop system would avoid this, but it’s more expensive, so we destroy ourselves instead.
so we destroy ourselves instead.
I think you mean we let a small, selfish minority destroy it for everyone else
All US households consume 1 trillion gallons water a year flushing toilets. That’s 4x more water consumption than datacenters.
Please elaborate what’s being destroyed for everyone.
tell you what, you stop shitting first and we’ll all see how that goes.
dude… indoor plumbing is fucking amazing.
are you really telling me you shit out in a hole in the ground?
see, plumbing has a genuine utility and has probably saved more lives than you can imagine.
that data centers are nearing the consumption of 1/4th of all us households indoor plumbing should be the stat that gives you pause, because we have yet to identify what the fuck it’s all for, while sucking 1.5 trillion dollars out of the economy while driving up prices for power, water, cpu, gpu, ram, memory based storage, disc based storage, fucking everything, while it walks people through committing mass murder AND undressing CHILDREN.
And you’re chuffed because ai, only, lol, sucks up one quarter of the amount of water used by all OF THE FUCKING TOILETS IN THE FUCKING COUNTRY, for fucking WHAT?
We got along just fuckin fine without ai data centers. and I dislike calling it ai; these massive resources are being sucked up by LLM development - training, inference, and execution - usually someone asking for a summary of a fucking email. it’s not alphafold, they aren’t going to save anything. they’re mashing the gas pedal into the climate crisis.
THINK FOR A MOMENT: HOW IS ALL THE WATER THAT AI IS ALREADY FUCKING USING JUSTIFYING ANY OF THESE PROBLEMS?
are you really telling me you shit out in a hole in the ground?
no but if water was my concern i might have done just that.
see, plumbing has a genuine utility and has probably saved more lives than you can imagine.
no shit.
but AI also has a genuine utility. and i’m not talking specialized algorithms that figure out protein folding or detect cancer. i mean regular chatbots.
personally i benefit enormously from it. i coded and shipped more in the past year than in last 10 years. at work i write more code in a day than i used to in a week. it helped me diagnose an autoimmune disease that require treatment that shitty doctors in my backwater country failed to do. it explains things i don’t understand. it helps me overcome my prejudice and help me be a better person. it provides me a second opinion when i need it. – that’s just a short list of shit ai helps me with. and i’m not using even 10% of it. there’s text-to-speach, there’s speach-to-text, there’s image generation, video generation, audio generation – these have enourmous amount of use cases, and helps enormous amount of people. think an indie dev that can solo an entire game in weeks/months that was previously simply impossible. think producers that can ship entire series for pennies. think all those dreamers that dreamed but lacked ability to actually produce.
honestly i don’t understand how you don’t see value in ai.
that data centers are nearing the consumption of 1/4th
that’s just 1% or even less of total US water consumption. agriculture sucks up 30% if i’m not mistaken. but okay agriculture is food. we really need food. but watering lawns. do we need our lawns green and pretty that bad to waste 1.5 trillion gallons of water on it? and that’s wasted, not total consumed. total consumed - multiply by 2.
driving up prices for cpu, gpu, ram, memory based storage, disc based storage
i can agree with that.
while it walks people through committing mass murder AND undressing CHILDREN
well ai is a tool. some tools are used by bad people to do bad things. but for every “this dude used ai to do bad stuff” article there’s a “this dude used ai to create a cancer vaccine for his dying dog” article
usually someone asking for a summary of a fucking email
do you know how useful that is? i mean maybe not for you, but for someone who have to handle hundreds of mails daily? but really that’s one real narrow real silly use case. more serious use cases: improved ai discovering new math, physics, chemistry, ai automating research - including usage of alphafold and all other scientific tools - to discover new drugs, new materials; ai optimizing business processes. and that’s not some ‘high-on-hope’ shit like it was just 2 years ago. it’s real. it’s happening right fucking now.
THINK FOR A MOMENT: HOW IS ALL THE WATER THAT AI IS ALREADY FUCKING USING JUSTIFYING ANY OF THESE PROBLEMS?
think for a moment: why are you wasting your time and effort and mental energy to fight technology? like what for? what do you want to achieve? i mean i understand what you want to achieve. but is it a realistic outcome? like how do you see this fight turning out for you? like tomorrow doland trump addresses the nation: “TODAY I’M STOPPING AI. NO MORE AI.” and xi goes like “特朗普停止了人工智能。我们也必须停止。”, and all businesses that are ears dip in ai shit all go like “yeah we ain’t need no ai, let’s undo all our automation workflows and rehire all those people we deleted”. you do you of course but i really, really hate wasting my effort on something that is very unlikely to happen.
i wanna get a bit personal - why are you doing this? “stop ai” isn’t a goal. what do you want to achieve by stopping ai? like what improvements in your day-to-day life do you see if it’s stopped? your relationships? work? do these improvements justify personal tragedies of millions of people who depend on ai?
and last question: have you actually used ai enough to confidently say it’s useless?
fuck that was a long write. and will be a long read. hope you’ll read it 😅
you obviously didn’t read my response or didn’t comprehend:
honestly i don’t understand how you don’t see value in ai.
probably had an LLM summarize it.
furthermore, the rest of your reply is drivel. like:
i coded and shipped more in the past year than in last 10 years.
your slopcode output has grown enormously! so much better thany the copypasta from stack, whoop-de-fuckin-doo.
no one cares.
ai helped you diagnose a disease your ‘shitty’ doctors
I don’t believe you. Straight up.
Or perhaps your docs are trying to tell you something.
re: the dog thing - FROM THE FUCKING ARTICLE, YOU TOOLBAG: Promising, but not a cure - It should be noted that this is a single dog, not a controlled study, and mast cell tumours can behave unpredictably. We cannot be sure how much of Rosie’s improvement is due to the vaccine, how long it will last, or whether the same approach would help other dogs, let alone humans.
The AI did not “cure cancer” by itself.
you’re the one who brought the subject of plumbing up, as if the US is shitting too much or our infrastructure should be reimagined to make shitting more efficient. Instead I fucking schooled you on why plumbing is nice and the AI use is ridiculous, and you simply ignore the hard parts lol.
Dude, you’re a cheerleader for LLMs. For fucks sake, go rent a personality, please, find a friend that you don’t have to calculate the token cost for, because I’m not it.
I’m anti-ai because it’s LLM garbage built on theft. You’re not bothered by the theft, illustrating how weak of character you and your LLM slurpin homies are.
1.5 TRILLION IN THE HOLE, FOR WHAT?
For your speculation that maybe it’ll pay off, jfc, if it was gonna happen it already would have happened you silly stupid fuckwit.
I want to get a bit personal: why do you need AI to justify your sad existence?
don’t bother to reply, I’m blocking you.
i’ll still reply. first of all, i want to apologize if my response seemed aggressive or insulting to you. that was not my intention. my communication style might feel rough at edgs but i carry no ill intent. i’m just trying to understand your position, and am trying to convey my position. like a normal exchange of opinions you know? you don’t have to get all defensive and insult me to prove your point.
you obviously didn’t read my response or didn’t comprehend:
i did read your response in fulll, in fact many times over.
your slopcode output has grown enormously! so much better thany the copypasta from stack, whoop-de-fuckin-doo.
you make baseless assumptions and belittle my experience and expertise based on… based on what exactly? me using ai? that’s not cool you know.
The AI did not “cure cancer” by itself.
i never said it did. i said, quote “this dude used ai to create a cancer vaccine for his dying dog".
re: the dog thing - FROM THE FUCKING ARTICLE, YOU TOOLBAG: Promising, but not a cure - It should be noted that this is a single dog, not a controlled study, and mast cell tumours can behave unpredictably. We cannot be sure how much of Rosie’s improvement is due to the vaccine, how long it will last, or whether the same approach would help other dogs, let alone humans.
you’re completely dismissing the rest of the article: tumors shrunk, condition improved, energy levels improved, dog got much better. And you know what else can be described as “We cannot be sure how much of Rosie’s improvement is due to the vaccine, how long it will last”? every fucking existing cancer treatment. No chemo is a guarantee you’ll defeat cancer, or that it will never come back.
you’re the one who brought the subject of plumbing up, as if the US is shitting too much or our infrastructure should be reimagined to make shitting more efficient. Instead I fucking schooled you on why plumbing is nice and the AI use is ridiculous, and you simply ignore the hard parts lol.
i didn’t ignore anything though? i validated your part that plumbing is essential but i objected your stance that “ai is useless”. and i brought US toilets up just to show how little water datacenters consume compared to ‘regular’ stuff like flushing a toilet. and okay my flushing toilets and agriculture examples were kinda bad. you can’t just remove canalization or farms without killing everyone. but there are things we waste water on more… wastefully? sorry for tautology.
my goal was to convey that the whole “SO MUCH WATER CONSUMPTION!!!” hysteria is only really relevant in draught-prone areas. and btw most other claims like “ai driving climate crisis” or the “heat dome” from some comment in this post are mostly pseudoscience.
if you really want to optimize water usage you should start with lawns, not ai.
Dude, you’re a cheerleader for LLMs. For fucks sake, go rent a personality, please, find a friend that you don’t have to calculate the token cost for, because I’m not it.
i’m a cheerleader for technology in general. techno optimist you could say. AI is only part of it.
I’m anti-ai because it’s LLM garbage built on theft. You’re not bothered by the theft, illustrating how weak of character you and your LLM slurpin homies are. built on theft. You’re not bothered by the theft
what exactly did LLMs, or companies that create them, steal from you? what meaningful contribution of knowledge did you make to this world that was worth “stealing” by LLMs?
1.5 TRILLION IN THE HOLE, FOR WHAT?
in the US. China for example spends around $120B. as for “FOR WHAT?” i already answered that.
i kinda dislike that you ignored the one part of my response that i’m most interested in:
i wanna get a bit personal - why are you doing this? “stop ai” isn’t a goal. what do you want to achieve by stopping ai? like what improvements in your day-to-day life do you see if it’s stopped? your relationships? work? do these improvements justify personal tragedies of millions of people who depend on ai?
And I want to make an accent on “justifiable” because you say a lot about ai expenses being unjustified. You want ai stopped. How do you justify disruption of millions of lives and businesses that rely heavily on ai?
that’s another long read for you 😅
That’s insane. I simply assumed they were closed loop systems because it makes sense. When I worked with HVAC systems, that’s all they ever were.
Wow.
Open loop is basically “use evaporative cooling to reduce electricity use”. For example, you could spray water on your home AC condenser to boost efficiency, although home units obviously aren’t intended to be constantly wet. Cooling towers are designed to be constantly wet and their radiator structures are very different, but the concept is the same.
All because a few trillion-dollar companies want lower electricity bills. Fuck, humans can be such greedy assholes.
I’ve always wondered why they don’t divert the water that condenses onto the cold evaporator coil to the hot condenser coil to cool it. I think some window units do it. I guess it would cause dust to accumulate faster or something.
Depending on where the figure is sourced, the water usage may include the electricity generation, in which case you might be using tons of water with a closed loop (data center) cooling system, because the power plant uses an open loop system. Open loop is wasteful, but if the climate is dry, it’s more effective because you get to reject the latent heat of vaporization of water, which is a shitload of energy. (That’s the technical term forgive my jargon.)
Future historians will just reiterate the same shit that has preceeded any man-made catastrophe. A relatively small group of men sought neverending power with bottomless greed at the expense of resources and everyone else.
There’s ones that use evaporative cooling, meaning they draw water off of a river/lake/creek (or domestic water supply) and cool through putting that water into the air. Lots of power plants do this exact thing, especially nuclear power plants.
There’s ones that use closed cycle cooling, like a bigass water cooled PC. The water generally stays inside. It periodically needs to be cycled.
There’s also measures out there that account for all of the water needed to produce all of the components. The water used for that is one time usage.
Are these things “using up” water? Sure, some of them are in the sense they are accelerating evaporation. Some are using very little water.
Some datacenters use no water because they’re thousands of times smaller than these new ones.
