The products covered by the obligation to repair currently include:

  • washing machines and washer-dryers
  • dishwashers
  • refrigerators
  • electronic displays
  • welding equipment
  • servers and data storage products
  • mobile phones, cordless phones and tablets
  • tumble dryers
  • e-bikes and e-scooters batteries (from 18 February 2027)
  • local space heaters
  • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Hold my beer” - Nintendo, releasing an EU centric revision. Meanwhile Apple and Samsung are digging up every legal loophole to prevent the law applying to their devices.

    • EowynCarter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think Nintendo will transition to having only one version on the long term, precisely not to have to deal with two versions.

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Apple and Samsung be like: “It’s not a mobile phone or a tablet, it’s a phablet so it does not fall in to any category of the devices that need to be repairable.”

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        The loophole in the directive is smaller phones. Smartphones go from 10.16 cm (4 inches) diagonal to 17. 78cm (7 inches) and everything bigger (up to 44.2 cm) is a tablet.

        Samsung and Apple’s flagship smartphones are very close to be considered tablets but that wouldn’t save them from the requirements.

    • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      “Hold my beer” - Nintendo, releasing an EU centric revision.

      i wonder, do we know what will be the price difference between the EU centric version and the international version?

    • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      85
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      iPhones are already super easy to repair. Apple have been at the forefront of this for years.

      For the downvoters who are too blinded by their hate for Apple to believe facts:

      https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/smartphone-repairability-scores

      PROS
      • Display and battery repairs are well-prioritized, though not as well as in other (dual-entry) iPhone models.
      • Torx screws secure the battery assembly in place, making replacements straightforward.
      • Repair parts and instructions are available straight from Apple.
      CONS
      • Five different screwhead types and the continued reliance on adhesives complicate basic repairs.
      • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        well, one thing that surely is not repairable about apple is their software. you can’t fix their operating system by installing a more meaningful alternative to it on your device, can you?

      • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        81
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Are we talking about the same apple that invented a new type of screw to keep people from taking their phones apart? The same apple that once people could get a trilobe driver, then made it so that generic replacement screens would not work because of some protection from non-apple hardware? Then went on to make sure that you can’t use non-apple parts in a laptop?

        • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Yes.

          https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/smartphone-repairability-scores

          PROS
          • Display and battery repairs are well-prioritized, though not as well as in other (dual-entry) iPhone models.
          • Torx screws secure the battery assembly in place, making replacements straightforward.
          • Repair parts and instructions are available straight from Apple.
          CONS
          • Five different screwhead types and the continued reliance on adhesives complicate basic repairs.
      • pwalker@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I have to admit that I haven’t checked ifix scores for a hot minute and am surprised that since the iphone 15 Apple consistently beats all other big brands in reparability score. Before that of course they were bad, which is probably why people remember them that way. I like that trend, hopefully Samsung and Google also hop on that bandwaggon any time soon.

        • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Strange that 73 other people, 30+ of who downvoted long after I added the proof, think that ifixit are wrong.

          • pwalker@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I don’t think they have a problem with the ifixit scores, more with the words you have chosen to convey your message. Also of course you will not find any love for Big Tech in the Fediverse ;-)

          • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Personally I downvoted you because you completely forgive/forget the older devices from Apple.

            They had sold approximately 2.2 billions of impossible to repair devices before they kind of changed course with the iPhone 14 line.

        • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Sounds like this is to prevent theft for parts. Considering it says right there that parts can be unlocked with the user’s account. So it’s the same mechanism that makes a stolen iPhone non-functional unless unlocked by the user.

            • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Ask the previous owner to remove the locking, same way as they would need to if you bought the device to use it. What’s the problem?

              Again, says right there they should just remove the device from ‘Find my’, which disables Activation Lock, the very same feature that prevents theft for reselling the device for regular use.

              Instead of using Repair Assistant to unlock the part, you can remove Activation Lock using Find My.

                  • lime!@feddit.nu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    53 minutes ago

                    no but i’m not talking about me. i’m talking about tyler, 27, who just gets a new phone and doesn’t care about whatever accounts the old one had, so he throws it away and now the parts are available at a repair shop.

        • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Same Apple. Signing new parts to your device is incredibly simple and DIY now.

          https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/smartphone-repairability-scores

          PROS
          • Display and battery repairs are well-prioritized, though not as well as in other (dual-entry) iPhone models.
          • Torx screws secure the battery assembly in place, making replacements straightforward.
          • Repair parts and instructions are available straight from Apple.
          CONS
          • Five different screwhead types and the continued reliance on adhesives complicate basic repairs.
            • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              I wouldn’t want to be putting second hand parts in my phone when repairing it. I can’t imagine there are many second hand screens or batteries around for sale given they’re the things that are replaced the most.

              Not that I’d ever want a second hand screen or battery anyway.

      • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Super easy to repair by certified repair shops or easy to repair by people at home with minimal tool requirements?

        • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          At home with minimal tool requirements

          https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/smartphone-repairability-scores

          PROS
          • Display and battery repairs are well-prioritized, though not as well as in other (dual-entry) iPhone models.
          • Torx screws secure the battery assembly in place, making replacements straightforward.
          • Repair parts and instructions are available straight from Apple.
          CONS
          • Five different screwhead types and the continued reliance on adhesives complicate basic repairs.

          Company that rates self repairability of phones: iPhones are easy to repair by yourself using basic tools

          Lemmy: no, that can’t be true because we hate apple

          • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Not bad by the standards of modern phones, but hopefully not good enough for the new EU standards. Imo adhesives should only be used if they’re replaceable or reusable and the screws should be limited to philips and flatheads.

            • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 hours ago

              PH screws can go to hell, they fucking suck I hate them. Flathead is just kind of annoying. Torx all the way, they are superior in every way.

            • 9bananas@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              13 hours ago

              hard disagree on the screws:

              philps and flatheads can be damaged too easily: torx or nothing!

              these teeny tiny screws are really finicky and both philips and flatheads are prone to slipping, causing faster wear and easily leading to stripped screws…

              any design that is inherently resistant to that is a must for small parts!

              source: worked in a repair shop ;)

              • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Sure thing, I don’t care much about the specific screw type, just that it’s a type that’s commonly available so you don’t need a unique screwdriver for each device you own.

            • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              No thank you on the flathead or Philips head screws, they get burred too easily which would basically leave your phone unrepairable.

              The less adhesives the better though, agreed there. Their phones are already definitely self-repairable enough for the new EU rules.

        • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Edited to add the single best source there is for the doubters and downvoters. Take a look.

          You only need a screwdriver set and maybe some rubbing alcohol.