You must log in or # to comment.
One lives in his basement and never showers and the other has all gay friends whom are nazies thru and thru.
These two deserve each other, fucking losers.
Incel losers clearly have attractiveness that is off the charts and too intimidating for anybody male or female to deal with. It’s so bad they can’t even fuck each other, because of the sheer levels of attractiveness involved.
For an equally unscientific, vibes based counter-argument (not to be taken seriously): Would it not stand to reason that a highly intelligent social species like humans (that also lacks obvious physical features intended to attract a mate, like the peacock’s feathers) would select a partner that is good at being social (ie. not being an arsehole) and that this is where these incels fail?
“naturally attractive” do these idiots seriously think that attractiveness is objective?
Isn’t the Greek statues being male thing also partly because they didn’t generally hold feminity in high regard compared to masculinity? Or was that the Romans?
Oh dude wtf are the chances of me seeing this after I heard the exact same thing on the radio the other day, but it was a woman saying this about other women. Impeccable timing
Unless it’s from Nietzsche
that is the most offhand justification for being gay ever
But still a valid justification for being gay. And I’d hazard it’s a requirement that you find men far more attractive than women. Because if you don’t, then you are merely Bi, (and might have the best of all worlds-- we need more science on that I think).
best of all worlds
no, thats being pansexual and polyamorous
Hmmm that sounds pretty gay you guys
it is like saying males need to display toxic masculinity to make up for lacking any interesting character traits.
“I’m not gay, its perfectly natural and totally hetro-masculine to get a boner over chiseled, glistening men… Its just science!”
I had a deeply religious room mate freshman year of college. He watched 300 at least 5 times in theaters and IDK how many times on DVD. I can only assume for the glistening chiseled men because its not that good. I always thought he was repressing his desires and this was the only way he could let them out at the time.
The argument about birds is ignorant because of basic behaviour ecology. Arguing from Zahavis handicap hypothesis males display strength by giving themselves a handicap. Being highly visible, lumbered with pointless feathers.
Females are camouflaged since they often are the ones on the nest.
Yeah, evolutionarily, the more conspicuous male birds drew away predators that would have otherwise attacked the nest. Thus making it more likely their offspring survived.
Thought this was a shitpost at first
All hot takes are shitposts now
I’m not gay but the man i sleep with is.
Studies have shown that at least half of all homosexual are gay.
Remember how society did that to Michael? This is toxic masculinity doing this to gay men.
Edit: the expectations, the racism, the surgeries.
