Fuck off

Fuck off

Marvelous

Fuck off

Fuck off

Fuck off

Fuck off

neovim

but

use whatever you like

My preferred text editors are Neovim and Kate

Kate has some convenient features, mainly the easy GUI. Neovim is the CLI text editor that I find works best for me.

tankies aren’t “further left than me” they’re “more authoritarian than me”

“further left than me” are idealist utopian communists and “more libertarian than me” are idealist utopian anarchists

If we do, we’re questioning doctors, so we look stupid

Circumcision being medical is almost entirely an excuse by religious people. Cases where it is needed are rare (although additionally there are cases where it is not needed but is one of the possible solutions) and most of these cases are later in life where the person can provide informed consent.

and we’re questioning women, who all (in my experience) say they aesthetically prefer it, so we look sexist

What the fuck? How is that sexist? Just because Amerikkkan women who are used to it prefer it because it’s what they see as normal (In saner countries where infant genital mutilation is rarer women tend to prefer uncut because it’s what’s normal there) doesn’t mean that it should be done. Your body your choice. That’s equivalent to saying that women refusing to try to try to sexually appeal to men as much as possible is misandry.

For what I’m saying how bad the thing is doesn’t matter, I do agree that FGM does more harm but the lack of consent is the real problem (eliminating the consent problem eliminates the entire problem, eliminating the harm problem does not solve the consent problem). I am not saying that FGM and circumcision are equally bad I am just saying that the root of the problem is the same in both cases.

unless your willing to fight all the other things parents do to their children without their consent

I am.

In this context age is not relevant as I am using the “synonym of man” definition of “boy”

I am talking about the fact that there are non-boys with penises (Such as myself, I am AMAB agender) and boys without penises.

There are better terms that could be used here. In this particular case, for example:

“The incidence of pathological phimosis is 0.4 per 1000 boys per year or 0.6% of boys are affected by their 15th birthday.”

“The incidence of pathological phimosis is, counting only people who have penises, 0.4 per 1000 people per year; 0.6% are affected by their 15th birthday.”

Less concise but accuracy>conciseness in this context

Yes but it shouldn’t be done to infants because they did not and cannot consent.

You can’t know whether the infant will come to see it as mutilation. And it is irreversible.

sybau

what??? how is this relevant

All of the “medical reasons” people tout are thin bullshit.

“it gets gross if you dont wash it” THEN FUCKING WASH IT IDIOT

I agree but you’re missing the point. It’s (primarily) not about the harm it does, it’s about consent not having been given. Newborns cannot consent to such things. They cannot make such a decision. Parents do not have the right to make such a decision, nor does anyone except the person themself.

stay away from illegal drugs

No, just be careful and make sure that you understand what you’re doing.