• I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I remember when Star Wars wasn’t political. It was a time known as “the movie didn’t even exist back then”.

        • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m a completely apolitical trans socialist in a queerplatonic relationship with a robotic hivemind, and I am OUTRAGED that some people these days are trying to politicise the prime directive and use it to force us to accept genetically engineered people!

          - Average Federation citizen

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            “Ugh were those people not paying attention when history class went over the eugenics wars‽ Next they’re going to suggest using nuclear weapons on inhabited worlds!”

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            What fediverse are you on where anyone is anything like that?

            I mean I know some people here have their problems, but I don’t think I’ve ever encountered anyone who checks all those boxes…

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t make Star Wars political… Except the rebels want to restore a democracy in the Original Trilogy…

    And in the prequels we have literal political scenes, as written and directed by Lucas himself.

    • auntieclokwise@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      And the Andor series is literally a class on fascism. Things presented there are inspired by real world events. The second season in particular makes it REALLY clear. You literally have the Empire conspiring with media to produce propaganda to undermine the Ghorman people so the Empire can come in and steal the planet’s resources and kill the people. Then the Empire stages a massacre and uses it as further propaganda

  • yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    But… but it was clearly allegory to Cold War?

    Back the day, murica was the good side, now, we could have 2 bads, sure, but back then, to big part of the world, murica was a Promise Land.

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My son honestly doesn’t understand that America was genuinely considered to be the good guys until quite recently.

      Edit to add : whether they actually were or not is way beyong my scope before someone starts up with “you havent been paying attention” and “dont you even know about reagan” etc.

      • AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        America was genuinely considered to be the good guys until quite recently.

        By whom‽

        • angrystego@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Europe, at least the parts of it I know well. The ww2 ending had that effect, which was then supported even more by the contrast of relative freedom compared to the totalitarian Russian hell many European countries fell into afterwards.

          • AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            There is quite a bit of the world who experiences America directly as the bad guy or indirectly funding the bad guys. Eurocentrism is its own issue.

            Europe, as is laid bare by Trump, exists as a lap dog to America as long as america was willing to pay lip service and to some sort of equality and drop some scraps from the table. It took the meaningless posturing of Trump saying he’ll annex Greenland for anyone in leadship to acknowledge the shit position Europe put themselves in. Just because Western Europe was in a better position than the neighbors or frankly much of the rest of the world doesn’t mean that they were in a good position for the capricious changes of American whimsy. That is not power that is just being adjacent to power.

            And now utterly unprepared to deal with a narcissist ungrounded in the historical alliance between America and western europe. And it’s not like this is the first time he’s been in power. And if you think America will put someone like that in power again then you failed to understand the conditions of Americans. For fuck’s sake, there are places where they still call it freedom fries because the French didn’t join a terrible war.

            Europe continues to be utterly unprepared for making the changes of another American narcissist. They are incapable of conceptualizing themselves as some sort of federated political entity that might have a political will other than whatever general direction America decides to lumber towards.

            • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Sure, but I didnt grow up in one of the places they invaded. To the Vietnamese they’re undoubtedly villains, but to a lot of the world they were “the leaders of the free world”. They were Elvis, big cars, burger joints and blues music, they were the flag planted on the moon. Before we had the internet, we experienced it through mainstream media.

              I think you’ve deliberately misunderstood the concept to go on an unnecessary rant about america bad.