FelixCress@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 6 days agoPervertlemmy.worldimagemessage-square36linkfedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down1206
arrow-up1-168arrow-down1imagePervertlemmy.worldFelixCress@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 6 days agomessage-square36linkfedilink
minus-squareFelixCress@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down14·5 days ago The comic is extremely stupid … or you just fail to understand it?
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·5 days agoOk, what I think it is: it’s a commentary on how women are ridiculous for dressing provocatively and then not expecting to get male attention for dressing that way. Now please, explain what I’m missing.
minus-squareFelixCress@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down13·5 days ago women are ridiculous for dressing provocatively and then not expecting to get male attention Nope. It is about some women walking with most of their tits exposed and then vilifying men for looking at them. But I guess you missed this part.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·5 days agoSure. Different angle on the same thing. As far as I can see, the author is still simply documenting what he thinks happens in the world. So where’s the funny? Where’s the subversion of expectations? Where’s the ol switcheroo? What part of this makes you have any reaction at all?
minus-squareFelixCress@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·5 days ago Different angle on the same thing Yes, as much as a chair is a different angle on the electric chair 🙄
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·5 days agoYou didn’t answer the question
minus-squareFelixCress@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·5 days agoAnd…? You do realise people are under no obligation to answer bad faith, nonsensical questions, don’t you?
minus-squareFelixCress@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down9·4 days agoIs it your wife giving blowjob to a clown?
… or you just fail to understand it?
Ok, what I think it is: it’s a commentary on how women are ridiculous for dressing provocatively and then not expecting to get male attention for dressing that way.
Now please, explain what I’m missing.
Nope. It is about some women walking with most of their tits exposed and then vilifying men for looking at them.
But I guess you missed this part.
Sure. Different angle on the same thing. As far as I can see, the author is still simply documenting what he thinks happens in the world.
So where’s the funny? Where’s the subversion of expectations? Where’s the ol switcheroo? What part of this makes you have any reaction at all?
Yes, as much as a chair is a different angle on the electric chair 🙄
You didn’t answer the question
And…? You do realise people are under no obligation to answer bad faith, nonsensical questions, don’t you?
🥱🤡
Is it your wife giving blowjob to a clown?