“Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: […] like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.” —Jonathan Swift
Why are you assuming the rodent is of unusual size? It could be the rodent, could be the elephant, could be both. As stationary observers in a vacuum, we simply cannot know how big these are relative to anything else.
Even the text could be in rodent-point font.
Are you seriously just going to dodge these accusations of Woods recording his distraught wife for his mistress’ amusement? Is there something you’re not telling us about your own cruel voyeurism?
Here’s a link to Elson’s website where the colors aren’t quite as saturated and there isn’t that small crease running down from the upper-left.
You’re right. In fact, I suspect Jaimee wanting to watch “desperate housewives” was her asking to watch secret footage Woods recorded of his wife Elin Nordegren whenever she was distressed. Utterly depraved.
Edit: Joking aside, “the benefit of the doubt” implies there’s doubt, but you’re manufacturing the doubt. People in a normal, healthy headspace do not think this way about text messages.
Yeah, if there were a pattern of that, I might agree. You’re taking a single data point and extrapolating way beyond reason. If you look at the rest of the texts, there’s nothing to suggest he treated her like you’re suggesting, and even if we didn’t have those other texts, there are just a million reasons why someone might’ve not gotten back until that third message. You’re chalking up what’s exceedingly likely just a coincidence (again, it’s an hour) to malice.
There’s literally even another text that reads: “don’t text me back till tomorrow morning. I have to many people around me right now”. Like this is an obvious problem for anyone cheating, let alone a celebrity. It was, again, the middle of a Wednesday; there’s no reason to expect Woods wasn’t just, like, a little busy for an hour. (Edit: I personally did this yesterday, realizing I outright forgot to reply.)
Nah, the unknownmuncher got it right before I did: if you think an hour between text messages is “the silent treatment”, you need to seriously reevaluate how you treat text messages.
You’re extrapolating way too much from these six texts. Like Tiger Woods is not a good person, but you’re seriously just assuming way too much here even accounting for that.
These were leaked by the New York Post in December 2009, so the lack of a year indicates September 30, 2009. (Woods was cheating with Jaimee from about April 2007 to December 2009.) I can think of a million reasons why a celebrity athlete in the middle of a Wednesday might not get back to their secret love affair via text for over an hour, let alone in an era where a text message was socially even less urgent than it is today.
Unless it’s obviously urgent, waiting an hour between messages is 100% normal; it’s a text message.
“Stop using meta people!” sounds like a protest chant for the second-class citizens of a B-grade cyberpunk dystopia.
Calling out the ever-popular duo of cynicism and inaction on Lemmy is not going to go over well.
For those who only have a few AUR packages installed, if you looked at the list and are still concerned, you can view the changelog at https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/log/?h=yourpackagenamehere. If it was secretly malicious but got missed, you’d see it there.
Mine does too on the latest Android. Maybe they’re using Graphene or something and it’s different there?
The most desirable desire path.
How did you come to the conclusion that section D does not apply?
I didn’t. I came to the conclusion that the criteria in Section D have already been cleared, because Section D discusses the cases in which the warranty will not apply; both parties clearly agree the warranty applies because Samsung offered Louis compensation. I don’t understand what warranty you were reading or why this is so difficult for you.
Specifically what part of Section D concerns you?
I can’t imagine how he’s going to get them to pay him more than what he paid.
I have no idea why you’re citing “Section D”. Section D is about the limitations of the warranty/liability, and that clearly doesn’t apply (they offered Louis compensation for the warranty; both parties agree this is within the bounds of the warranty). Sections B, C, and D have been met because both parties agree they have been.
The warranty (Section A) reads:
Samsung will, at its option, either: (1) repair or replace the Product with new or refurbished Product of equal or greater capacity and functionality; or (2) refund the then current market value of the Product at the time the warranty claim is made to Samsung if Samsung is unable to repair or replace the Product.
Samsung therefore has two options: 1) repair/replace the unit or 2) pay Louis the current market value. That’s not even slightly ambiguous. Even if you agree that “at its option” means that “unable to repair or replace the Product” is 100% up to Samsung regardless of its actual ability (which it appears to be), that still means they owe him current market value, which is in the ~$900 range – not what he paid for it. You’re way off-base with your assessment.
(edit: “does not apply” was, I hope, clearly intended to mean “in reference to this conversation because the criteria have obviously been met”.)
Lindsey Graham has been rumored for years to be closeted gay; the “ladybugs” thing specifically comes from a satire story (full text here) where Graham calls the moles on his taint his “little ladybugs”.
Like it’s clear at least Massie is gone because he went against Trump and probably Mace too, but using a sample size of four to say “Yup, it’s the Epstein files” is obviously unsound.
The article is correct on the grounds that it is too simple to reduce it to that singular cause.
It’s AI slop. Look at his left hand, and more importantly, any actual artist would watermark this.
In the article you didn’t read:
It’s too simple to reduce Mace, Greene and Massie’s loss of power to the Epstein files.
Never change, Lemmy.
(Edit: Not, of course, that you’d have to read an article to know that a sample size of four isn’t sufficient to connect the two.)
Here’s McFeeters’ campaign statement, for those wondering. I was with him until he started throwing “globalist” into the mix left and right.
That is, I don’t know if the “small group of men [who] have controlled the creation of money, manipulated markets, and accumulated enormous power” are the same ones I’d be thinking of. Somehow probably couldn’t have been worse than Tuberville, though.
Edit: I also just want to say that McFeeters looks like Joe Biden’s deep-south cousin who’s also a mascot for grits.