• Godric@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, yeah, that is the primary purpose, but I don’t see how one can effectively have a modern state without Photo ID. I loathe surveillance, but I accept minor infringements upon me that I recognize as necessary for the sake of us all in many areas. Sorry if I’m explaining poorly!

          • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I envision replacing the state’s central ID databases with a federated system of ID verifiers who have trust among each other and who are run by their members democratically. That way you can choose a verifier that you trust to keep your data private but can vouch for your among broader society.

            Very similar to the way the fediverse works. I have my account along one instance, but other instances allow my identity as LibertyLizard to exist as a quasi-account elsewhere so that I can interact with everyone, and so everyone knows I am me. However my true identity does not need to be known for this to work.

            • notabot@piefed.social
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              26 days ago

              I’ve been thinking along similar lines as this implicitly allows you to have multiple IDs, and for a lot of things it works well, especially if you can choose what attributes to attach to a specific ID, so, for instance, you could gave an ID that says you’re over 18, but gives no other information, and a separate one with your name and address.

              Where it falls down is when you need to ensure individuals are only counted once, for instance, when voting. You could have a state ID issuer, but that gets us right back to the original problem.