• Godric@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, yeah, that is the primary purpose, but I don’t see how one can effectively have a modern state without Photo ID. I loathe surveillance, but I accept minor infringements upon me that I recognize as necessary for the sake of us all in many areas. Sorry if I’m explaining poorly!

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I envision replacing the state’s central ID databases with a federated system of ID verifiers who have trust among each other and who are run by their members democratically. That way you can choose a verifier that you trust to keep your data private but can vouch for your among broader society.

      Very similar to the way the fediverse works. I have my account along one instance, but other instances allow my identity as LibertyLizard to exist as a quasi-account elsewhere so that I can interact with everyone, and so everyone knows I am me. However my true identity does not need to be known for this to work.

      • notabot@piefed.social
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        I’ve been thinking along similar lines as this implicitly allows you to have multiple IDs, and for a lot of things it works well, especially if you can choose what attributes to attach to a specific ID, so, for instance, you could gave an ID that says you’re over 18, but gives no other information, and a separate one with your name and address.

        Where it falls down is when you need to ensure individuals are only counted once, for instance, when voting. You could have a state ID issuer, but that gets us right back to the original problem.