When O’Leary (of Dragon’s Den fame) first announced the project a year and a half ago alongside municipal and provincial representatives, they described the project as “the world’s largest AI Data Centre Industrial Park.” The project is slated to need about 7.5 GW of power when fully built.

That’s roughly seven times the amount of electricity generated by the Site C dam in northern BC.

Much of that power is poised to come from natural gas. The company’s initial announcements about the project claimed it would use geothermal power and gas. However, emails _Canada’s National Observer _obtained through a Freedom of Information request from the municipality where the project is located suggest O’Leary’s company rapidly ditched plans for geothermal power in favour of exclusively using natural gas.

If the project is entirely powered by natural gas and doesn’t capture any of those emissions, it will set Canada back 20 years in carbon emissions reductions and wipe out the reductions gained by phasing out coal, according to Will Noel, senior analyst with the Pembina Institute’s electricity team.

Ottawa’s decision to roll back federal climate rules for Alberta’s AI industry comes after intense lobbying efforts by Capital Power, an Alberta electricity company building a gas-powered AI data centre. And Evan Solomon, Canada’s AI minister, has only met with mining and energy companies about the environmental impacts of AI data centres — but so far has ignored environmental groups.

    • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not just Albertans as you will literally see a post on r/britishcolumbia worried about this upcoming fire season and heatwaves and then the next post is applauding Carney’s push to build more LNG terminals to extract and ship even more methane which is horrible for the environment despite the greenwashing, but if you oppose, you gets defensive, belligerent attacks about not supporting Canada’s sovereignty and such BS. We get what we sow.

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hey, I think I’m okay.

      If you want to revise that to a majority of Albertans, you’d be closer. Although most people that vote for the UCP don’t actually agree with them.

      • grey_maniac@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        What kind of pOS do you you need to be to vote for someone you don’t agree with? Why would you do that?

        • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Welcome to (especially rural) Alberta. It’s a really tribal thing - there’s a vibe that voting anyone other than Conservative is a betrayal of the community. (Notice Danielle Smith straight-up banned any other parties from calling themselves Conservative, recently)

          I was talking to some people from Battle River-Crowfoot, back when PP stole the seat. They were pissed, going on about how much they hate him, and how great the last guy was. Aaand then conversation shifted to how to spell “Poilievre” on the write-in ballot, so it would be counted properly. There was no irony acknowledged, or even a break of any kind to separate the two.

          Separating from Canada? Everyone hates it. Messing with people’s pensions as a step towards it? Everyone hates it. Busting strikes? People were pissed, and her polls sure dropped. Buuut it was short lived, and the UCP is still leading, despite separatism being about half of their platform.

          TBF, you can argue about whether that matters, or if voting blindly for a candidate who’s awful is actually worse than just knowingly being awful. It is frustrating as hell, for sure.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hey now! The federal government also had to exempt Alberta from federal environmental regulations to allow this to go through.

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is not to support AI. This is to support AB fossil fuel industry. All they look for is an excuse to burn burn burn.

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    I hate everything about this: the pandering to a billionaire, the continued corruption to support oil and gas and how the regulation gives the director so much latitude.

    You can do full or partial provincial EIAs (and small projects are often exempt) but this project should absolutely have an EIA as it’s novel technology and had large cumulative effects. If you’re going to make projects like pulp mills and highways have an EIA this should be a dead ringer

  • AGM@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    And, unsurprisingly, it’s a US-based firm leading the funding for the project with $100 million.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because some things are more important than the only planet in our solar system that can possibly sustain our species and virtually all life.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I just watched that the other night

      Benn has taken an,amazing turn with his channel and I’m all for it.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Build it in Quebec on hydro power and I have zero issue.

    Do it like this and I will do everything in my power to stop it.