All it took was a Taiwanese billionaire tech mogul sticking his dick where he shouldn’t. At this point, im willing to crowdfund his prostitutes.

  • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    22 minutes ago

    He has so much money he could literally hire someone to find him a different girlfriend for every day of the year and hire one additional person per girlfriend to make sure the girlfriend is happy. But no he has to fuck the girls from work.

    • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      This right here.

      In evolutionary psychology terms, there is nothing more attractive than having a child that is legally guaranteed generational wealth.

      I don’t know if you’ve ever met anyone with generational wealth, but after a few generations they become extremely attractive.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s more than obvious that this scandal is now being used to explain the complete failure of the financial system through such a trivial matter. These people apparently still think they need a scapegoat—this time they’re even presenting someone from their own ranks (presumably because he isn’t white).

    I cannot, for the life of me, understand why social media is still buying into this. This is obviously the buildup to the inevitable crash, which was by no means caused by LLM technology itself, but rather by the ridiculously inflated expectations of the “financial experts.”

    This may be amusing right now, but soon all of this will cost the little guys all their money. That’s as certain as death and taxes, since the U.S. is obviously incapable of even beginning to rein in its degenerate financial system—which is screwing over the entire world—as it’s controlled by the very few people who have a stake in this absurdity.

    This has nothing to do with a CEO or his affairs, but with a failed system that is dragging everyone—who, absurdly, still clings to it—down with it.

    This is not the fault of an CEO with Asian heritage and his mistress; it is what the U.S. system ultimately boils down to. Pinning it all on this case is absolutely indicative of the degenerate white supremacist oligarchy that the U.S. truly is.

  • restingOface@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s crazy how after countless controversies, what finally takes them down is infidelity. Like the Klein guy recently.

    • zoloftt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I mean, it was probably the part where China was getting sanctioned technology…

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        A patient choosing to end their life is more morally wrong than the death penalty? This must be the conservative “they deserve it” mentality.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The problem with that is morality isn’t binary. People will find some things more wrong than others without ever considering them moral.

      • VeganBtw@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Eating meat not being a moral issue according to a majority of people and only 4% of people condemning it? Thanks, ignorance and cognitive dissonance!

              • VeganBtw@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Well how deep do you want to go?

                Because one way or another, people seeing “eating meat” as not being a moral issue either don’t understand the moral implications of it (industrial livestock farming for the most part) or don’t care about it, and I suspect cognitive dissonance is doing the heavy lifting in the latter case.

                • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  46 minutes ago

                  I was going to become vegan if I couldn’t handle personally raising and slaughtering an animal. Turns out… I can. The first time I killed a goat, one of the other goats gave birth to twins at the same time. I had a moment… individuals die, but the herd persists. These goats eat a bunch of naturally occurring grass and weeds. I can totally ice one and turn him into tacos a couple of times a year and it’s pretty much environmentally neutral. Absolutely morally neutral

                • cattywampas@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  People eat meat because they don’t value animal lives like human lives. You can make a moral argument against that, and you’d have a good case for it, but it’s not cognitively dissonant.

                • Grimy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  They don’t care. I don’t think you are wrong for caring, just that you aren’t being realistic. The life of a chicken has little value for 99% of people.

                • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Aren’t you the guy that criticises parents for feeding their children meat despite having no kids or any background in pediatric nutrition?

  • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I thought the R/I format was dead and buried ten years ago

    Edit: Man I really looked at this image and didn’t have a single neuron fire in my head. One image and its reply statistics is not a meme. The “format” I had in mind is when someone would put two images next to each other with different stats below and the joke is that idea X spurs more discussion/horny image posting/whatever. The stats tell a story when you compare two sets of stats. I am a fraud. Forgive me.

    This is through pure osmosis, never used the site.