• Rising costs / decline in incomes
• Failing infrastructure
• Decline in education
• Repression of history
• Brainwash through social media
• Nostalgia

Is this an ad for the watterbottle?

People always come up to me, with tears in their eyes, and they say, ‘Sir, nobody has smaller, more beautiful hands than you.’ And it’s true! They are magnificent, perfectly proportioned, truly world-class hands - the fake news likes to exaggerate, but everybody knows my fingers are absolute perfection! And you know, when you’re a star, they just let you do it. You can do anything. You can grab ’em by the pussy with these little hands - and let me tell you, nobody grabs better than me, okay? Nobody!

That’s anyway all I see if he’s on the screen:

Legit marketing slogan for a brothel.

That’s so cute and stylish!

No! Politicians should be obligated to wear them, so the people can see who’s bribing them!

How they are doing that?

Umm what?

That’s the future people. Not flying cars over rainbows but self-driving prisons in dystopia.

If no one starts the change, nothing ever will change. Someone has to go through the hassle so others can follow.

Why shouldn’t they feel like “assholes” forcing you to use WhatsApp umin the first place? I quit WhatsApp years ago. Everyone I know uses either Signal or Telegram (still better than Meta).

Don’t overcomplicate things. Just stick to what you feel is right.

She gave a shit about it!

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/hyrox-diarrhea-apology-9.7347697

You can address issues without putting yourself in a position that excludes others. Where will we end up if there are only “marginalized groups” trying to strengthen their position? In this example, the feminist movement is met with masculism (“Manosphere”), the rise of right-wing/fascist movements (Proud Boys), and so on. And on the women’s side, there are also movements against “woke” feminism (Tradwives, religious movements, etc.).

Giving advantage to one group automatically results in the disadvantage of another - or at least that is how it feels to the “disadvantaged” group. Let’s take the example of women’s quotas: all other marginalized groups - and men as well - are disadvantaged by this, because suddenly it is no longer their performance that counts, but only their gender. This is exactly what men are constantly accused of and where the discrimination of women with the same performance comes from.

That’s why I stand by my position that discrimination cannot be defeated through exclusion and accusations. We need a unified perspective that grants everyone the same rights and responsibilities. Those who do not give love will never receive it.

I agree that gender-based discrimination exists, but the path to equality is not to demand quotas for women and thereby discriminate against other genders. Either there are equal quotas for all groups (gender, religion, skin color, etc.) or there are none at all.

I think modern feminism does more harm than good, since it is what makes separation visible in the first place. Since I view separation as the root of virtually every problem in human history, I would therefore consider myself a “humanist” who views all people—regardless of gender, skin color, origin, or other characteristics that could serve to create separation—as equal. We must overcome this division.

Yeah, Twitter did already because I connected with a VPN once. Good, no more Twitter then.

People need to fight back! But I guess it’s already too late. They’ve already succeeded in dividing the young people, so there can be no coordination or solidarity. Brainrot is real!

Quality over quantity!

Alternative title: Canadian oligarchs want to participate in Ukrainian money laundering scheme