Nothing about genAI is harmless. Copyright theft, environmental disasters, hardware inflation, AI psychosis, general dumbing down of society, and causing the next Great Depression are harmful, for starters. Using it because “it’s there and it’s free” does not abdicate them from responsibility for promoting an incredibly harmful technology.
All things GenAI deserve to be downvoted. That’s why you might find it downvoted.
More like Xi
The only reason an asshole would gravitate to a particular instance would have to have something to do with that instance.
Ah shit, I don’t know what to make of this, but it’s juicy
It makes absolutely no sense. And I’ve never seen any statements or marketing from Apple that makes such a suggestion.
LOOOOOLOL what kind of “enterprise work”? Like Fuckerberg’s Metaverse?
As much as anyone does. I’m sure it’s at least profitable for them.
He opened a hearing earlier this month by lambasting Democrats for having “relentlessly attacked” the president’s nominees with this question, and suggested their questions are “political theater” with no meaningful purpose behind them.
Hey moron. The “meaningful purpose” is determining whether your allegiance lies with the American people or the authoritarian-in-chief. It’s not a hard question.
A mistake so big they made it twice. It’s amazing how you can throw like, infinite money at VR with the expectation that consumers will just wear these things on their faces all day long and still fail.
Valve has and will continue to succeed because they operate on the only genre suitable for VR: gaming.
And porn, but mostly gaming.
That why he fired her?
deleted by creator
Just accept the fact that that you misunderstood me because you did not read thoroughly. No need to dig deeper. It’s just a misunderstanding.
Who’s going to stop Trump? Trump’s FCC? Trump’s Supreme Court? Seems unlikely…
Man that sucks for Powell but good for Americans, I guess?
FOR FUCKS SAKE, I ALREADY SAID I WASNT TALKING ABOUT THE STEAM APP
You keep saying it’s a misunderstanding and then blaming me because you didn’t pay attention to the context of the conversation. If there’s a misunderstanding, it’s on you.
You consider the Steam Deck to be a 3rd party product?
LOL what!? Please elaborate because this sounds like a fundamental, much deeper problem than what we’re discussing.
I don’t know what that’s supposed to mean. I’m not “going after the end result”, I’m just holding the responsible parties responsible.
Development would end tomorrow if people stopped using it.
Uhhh no, I don’t think so. You could make similar arguments regarding computers in the context of consumerism and lack of ability or willingness to repair or demand repairability, yes.
Not in general. All the major platforms, I can and do make a very similar argument.
Incorrect, it is both.