• craneum_@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The way i understand it is that remote attestation (main point of this article) makes it possible for services to deny unapproved software. They can deny off market devices, operating systems, or certain password managers. So even if you use password managers you mentioned, if you’re using off market OS (e.x lineageos) they can deny access. Here’s a quote from the article “Remote attestation lets a website demand cryptographic proof that your device, operating system, firmware, and passkey manager are all on an approved list.”

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          It’s more like how my bank has started locking users out of online banking if they don’t have the mobile app for authentication, and preventing the mobile app authenticating the user if they’re running a non-approved version of Android like GrapheneOS. Try to gain digital independence and all these mechanisms will be used to shut you out of everything you need. Only thoroughly locked-down and surveiled devices will be allowed to access useful services.

    • 0xDREADBEEF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      and your redundant 3-2-1 backup system of that. Everyone knows that! Surely no one has no backups. Oh well, can’t design around that unpredictable problem that no one could guess. Everyone has backups!