Don_Dickle@lemmy.worldM to Ask Science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoIf we found a way to compact nuclear energy for like cars or homes or whatever without the risk of exposure or an Atomic Bomb, why or why not would we use it considering how long it lasts?message-squaremessage-square17linkfedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down13
arrow-up116arrow-down1message-squareIf we found a way to compact nuclear energy for like cars or homes or whatever without the risk of exposure or an Atomic Bomb, why or why not would we use it considering how long it lasts?Don_Dickle@lemmy.worldM to Ask Science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square17linkfedilink
minus-squarereddig33@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-21 month agodeleted by creator
minus-squarehalcyoncmdr@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·5 months agoCool, let’s take some of the roughly $700 Billion spent on fossil fuel subsidies annually and apply it there instead of coal and natural gas plants.
minus-squarefrongt@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·5 months agoI am more than okay with my tax dollars subsidizing reprocessing if it means significantly less nuclear waste sitting around.
deleted by creator
Cool, let’s take some of the roughly $700 Billion spent on fossil fuel subsidies annually and apply it there instead of coal and natural gas plants.
I am more than okay with my tax dollars subsidizing reprocessing if it means significantly less nuclear waste sitting around.