• ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’d prefer that over it being meaningless.

    This is a world where everyone is extremely accepting, no one cares this character is gay and they act the exact same as every other character but… let’s remind the audience they’re gay at every turn and it’s somehow a disadvantage that never comes up.

    It’s like when a girl character is written like a boy. Why make the distinction if it’s not something the person being represented can relate to?

    • LurkingLuddite@piefed.socialBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why make the distinction? Exactly! They made no distinction, except for adding the token…

      While my example was warning against cliche extremes, you point at the exact other end of tokenization that exists in droves in modern media. Vapid, stupid, uncreative, and pointless “representation” that does nothing but assuage the ignorant and inflame the opposition.

    • DeLancre@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’d prefer that over it being meaningless.

      Folks, I think we found that mysterious target audience behind “Star Trek: Discovery”