• mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    god, I wish. bus routes here are generally 3x longer at minimum

    last route I checked against a 22min drive was 90min by bus

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, I can tolerate up to 2x the length of the drive, above that is where I start to get annoyed. I know transfers happen, and they are unavoidable, but a well oiled system keeps them to a minimum and keeps bus routes direct.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Where I live, and for the places I want to go, typical travel times are:

      • car: 15 minutes
      • bike: 25 minutes
      • walk: 1.5 hours
      • transit: 45 minutes

      Or:

      • car: 20 minutes
      • bike: 35 minutes
      • walk: 2 hours
      • transit: 1 hour

      And, that’s if it’s a good time of day for transit. If I’m coming back home near 11pm the transit option can be essentially the same as walking. If I have the option to leave at 11:15 so I can arrive 5 minutes before the bus instead of leaving at 11:00 and waiting 20 minutes for the bus, and the bus is on time, and the bus I’m supposed to connect to is on time, then the bus option can be noticeably faster than walking. But, if the first bus is running late (which happens all the time) it can mean missing the next connection, and walking is actually faster than taking the bus, even if it’s a walk of more than an hour.

      So, needless to say, I bike whenever the weather permits. But, unfortunately, winter is awful here, the bike lanes and trails aren’t plowed in the winter, so biking for roughly half the year isn’t a real option.