• Bad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Without consent” would be a far more technically correct way to put it, and still convey most of the same emotional weight.

    But worrying about the technicalities of communication instead of the intended message is all sizzle and no steak. Communication is about communicating; and the listening part is too.

    • jve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      “Without consent” would be a far more technically correct way to put it, and still convey most of the same emotional weight.

      How is it any more “correct?”

      What is the meaningful distinction between “will” and “consent”, here?

      Whether a child “wants” to be born or not is a meaningless question, no matter which word you choose.

    • forkDestroyer@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Same goes for consent. You have no ability to do anything before you exist, because there is no you, unless you believe in having a soul or attachment outside of our plane of existence.

      But yes, at the root of it all: You may not have chosen to be here (or maybe you did and you just don’t remember and don’t like your experience now), but perhaps you can make the most of your short time present.

      Welcome to Earth and try to enjoy the ride. Nothing seems to be permanent.

      • Bad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Consent is an action. You can do nothing while you don’t exist. (Usually not doing things is all you do while not existing.) You must be alive (or have been alive) to consent (or have consented).

        “Against my will” requires you to have preferences to be ignored. This can’t happen before you have preferences.