• pewpew@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      According to Google yes, because the Play Store is the “official” way of installing software.

      But personally I hate this mentality and I don’t want a centralized and controlled way of installing software

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yes, exactly, adopting the term side loading into our common vernacular is exactly what they want us to do. They want us to view installing apps from places other than the Play Store as Bad™ and Dangerous™ so they can better control what we do.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Arch’s package management is actually the ideal, in my opinion. Official repositories for the stuff the distro maintainers want to officially support, a user-maintained AUR for other common packages, and the ability to build your own software with the Arch Build System, and letting pacman know where everything is. In a sense, the stuff in the official repositories have a privileged position, and you should be aware of the difference between the AUR and the official repositories, but you’re still always in control of what software is installed.

      The AUR packages and user-specific builds can be thought of as side loading, and the distinction can matter in some circumstances. So I’m ok with having another name for different installation/upgrade/update methods.