As the title.

Should there be a new rule added where intentional removal of credits and watermarks from other peoples works be deleted?

Only thing i can think against it is if the original artist isn’t known. Usually someone in the comments finds it though

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Yes. Unfortunately, proving intentionality in smaller cases than beep may be difficult. But it’s useful as something to lean back on when it’s obvious/egregious like their case.

    First step would be enforcing the existing rules lime two posts per day per user, imo.

  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I actually think it’s morally correct to strip stone toss or Scott Adam’s names from thier works.

  • username_1@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    No? Why? The best thing with rules is to have as few rules as possible. Your proposition adds the rule but does not improve user experience. Bad rule.

      • username_1@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        “Who cares about fun? We are here for more arbitrary reasons to ban!” Ok, fascist-toddler-mayor, good luck with that shit.

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Is your name “a community”? I for one don’t care either way. I can always ask an OP if I want to know who created a strip I liked if a signature is missing.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yes, I solely represent the entire community and we all agree on this topic.

          Or, and this is even crazier, I saw the many threads where Beep was downvoted to shit and berated because of this, and I’m able to summarize that information.

          But no, that can’t be right because it means you’re not the center of the universe. It must be that first one.

          • FelixCress@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            But no, that can’t be right because it means you’re not the center of the universe. It must be that first one.

            According to you, it is yourself who is the centre. Go figure 🙄

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              I’m not sure that aggregating other people’s data and then summarizing it counts as me being self-centered. But maybe I just don’t understand how that word works.