Nice distraction. But isn’t the real issue murdering americans then calling them terrorists to justify it? Or forcibly deporting tons of people with no due process?
No, the problem is her husband dressed up with fake tits.
“The family was blindsided by this, and they ask for privacy and prayers at the time,” Kristi Noem’s representatives reacted in a statement to The New York Post.
Fuck that noise.
I love how they treat a family member being outed as a cross dresser like a death in the family. That so tracks.
Privacy for the ghoul in charge of ripping people from their homes in the middle of the night? Fuck you.
Prayers for what? To have God help them stop being shitty and hypocritical? Fuck you again.
Cross dressing is now illegal in Ohio. In a bill that is vaguely worded and will be enforced very subjectively because nature didn’t clarify what clothes are masculine and feminine
Things are bad; I’m not going to argue that things aren’t bad. I’m not a lawyer, I eat crayons.
That Ohio bill hasn’t been passed yet. I don’t know how likely it is to pass. Too likely, I guess.
It also doesn’t dictate a blanket ban on cross-dressing. What it does do is put “performers or entertainers who exhibit a gender identity that is different from the performer’s or entertainer’s biological sex” into the category of adult entertainments like stripping, meaning it’s restricted in the same ways. No kids allowed. That’s lines 153 to 165 here.
That’s very big, it’s very bad, it’s very stupid, it’s mean, it’s anti-freedom. Un-American, I’d say. It would seem to create problems with Bugs Bunny, Harpo Marx, Monty Python, etc. But the most obvious thing it’s targeting is “Drag Queen Story Hour.”
But it isn’t a ban on cross-dressing in general. Yet.
Edit: If you live in Ohio, you can find and contact your state Senator regarding House Bill 249, the “Indecent Exposure Modernization Act,” through this page.
How are they defining performer or entertainer?
Walking in public
