• dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    The post mentions World ID as an example of a third-party service that used biometrics as a basis to prove humanness, and says “the internet needs verification solutions like this, where your account information, usage data, and identity never mix.”

    Yup, knew it. This is all just an excuse to get Sam Altman to scan your eyeballs

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      They already know it’s mostly bots. They just want to pimp out their human users more. They know they are suckers because they are still on there.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The article basically says that posting using the API will get posts labeled as “[App]”. That’s what it boils down to. They even talk about human accounts using AI to write posts.

          • Pennomi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m just saying that the proposed solution will be ineffective at filtering bots, but create a false sense of security.

        • Evotech@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’ll be much more annoying to automate but can’t the ais just use computers now?

          Much more expensive to manage bot farms though

          • Pennomi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s trivial to automate browser clicks like that with AI these days.

            But yeah, more expensive than an API call.

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t necessarily support this, but I feel like this at least adds a barrier to a single person setting up hundreds of bot accounts easily. Similar to locking your doors, it just adds friction to those that would otherwise not put a lot of effort in. People can still break into your house/run a bot farm, but this makes it just that much more difficult. Again, I don’t really support doing this, and it’s definitely not being done for user’s benefit, but it will likely have some impact on botting.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        but I feel like this at least adds a barrier to a single person setting up hundreds of bot accounts easily

        Cheap labor from scam centers in India has entered the chat

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why are you posting ads for a website?? Shouldn’t you just post the content here so you’re not advertising???