• ace_garp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    You could make a start-up search-engine that reliably filters out any AI content.

    $10 per year subs. I’ll be your first subscriber :]

    • luciferofastora@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Reliably detecting AI content would require AI to be reliable in the first place in order to be clearly detectable.

      Unless you serve no results at all, of course.

      • ace_garp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Crowd-sourced flagging could identify the AI or non-AI content, along with white listing certain trusted domains.

        You only need to clear the top 2 pages of each search query string, because that is pretty much all people use.

        • Christian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Unfortunately there will be many users more likely to flag viewpoints they disagree with than actual AI, so you’ll end up creating people who associate AI-flagging with censorship.

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Exactly, plus if it becomes popular at all. Corporate bad actors will intentionally poison the results.

            • ace_garp@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Not if you hand the voting power out randomly, like early Slashdot. Every 300th-2000th visitor gets to vote on the content.