About 40% of Americans have cut back on streaming services in the last three months because of financial concerns, according to a recent report
Americans are quitting subscription streaming services in droves as the cost of living continues to climb, a recent report has found.
Streaming services such as Netflix and Hulu have become increasingly popular in recent years, but Deloitte’s 2026 Digital Media Trends report, released late last month, shows how Americans are getting frustrated over the cost to have their favorite movies and TV shows at the click of a button.
“As the cost of everyday essentials like food and housing remain high, many consumers are reevaluating their budgets and cutting back on nonessential expenditures,” Deloitte said in its survey results. “At the same time, prices for media and entertainment services continue to climb.”
My Jellyfin server is doing great. My only constraint is my free disk space
Jellyfin is the way. Streaming only made sense when prices were low and all the content was basically in one place.
I’ll just keep growing my personal library.
Disk space (cost) is a genuine problem nowadays
Yea, fucking AI making it too expensive to be a data hoarder. I have to keep making hard decisions on which media to delete.
I’m kicking myself now for not buying more 20 TB hard drives when they were under $250. It’s rough out there for any computer related hobbies right now.
I bought two right before stuff jumped too badly. Looked about a week later thinking buying another one might be an ok idea, rofl no way I can justify it now…
So now I’m debating if I really NEED backups… certainly not of everything… I still need a video card, and those never did really come back down…
If you have the processing power to spare (and haven’t done it already), you might be able to re-encode your media files to a more space-efficient codec.
I’ve reduced some of my video files by as much at 75% using Handbrake to convert from AVC to H.264 or H.265. I’m not the most discerning viewer, so I haven’t noticed any difference in video quality, but I’ve definitely noticed the extra space on my drives!
Just as a heads up, if you aren’t concerned about “copyright”/“intellectual property” the better way would be to download native h.265 rips instead of re-encoding your existing h.264 files, as those will look better since you aren’t compressing the already existing compression artifacts of your old files. Copy of a copy and all that.
AV1 can double again the savings for the same quality
I’ve got an ffmpeg script saved on my Mac which re-encodes video to a fraction of its original size without any apparent loss of quality. Shit’s basically magic.
I have one for audio as well, but I think it’s an Apple-only MP4 codec, that requires you to have to manually build it into ffmpeg on any other platform. But the end result is that my 2 hour radio show AIFFs that start out at 4GB end up being high quality MP4 at around 75mb.
Like I said, magic.
I misread that as ffmpreg…which means I have spent way too much time on AO3 in the past few years.
Do you happen to remember where you got it? I’ve got a Mac and while the idea of going through all the media files on my servers to convert them I twitch a little bit, but would also love to cut down space without giving up some of my files
Pretty sure it’s this command;
ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vcodec libx265 -crf 30 -tag:v hvc1 output.mp4
On my M2 Air, conversions are usually pretty quick, depending on the size of the input. After a short while it does throttle because there’s no fan, but it counters along nicely.
As for audio; I use XLD, set to encode HE-AAC at 80kbps. It seems really low, but still sounds great.
Not all hero’s wear capes
Which is why it can make sense to pay for pirate shares.
Many are around $5-8/mo, and they’re libraries are bigger than my own, with the added bonus of I don’t have to do any maintenance.
$60 to $98 per year, is a better deal than paying for these HDD prices. For me at least the trade-offs are worth it.
Private torrent tracker groups are better and free
Not at these storage costs, which was my point.
Dude. Tell me more.
What would you like to know?
How does a fella get piped into those private torrent tracker groups?
You get invited. You gotta know someone with an invite willing to vouch for you. There are strict client and ratio requirements to maintain good standing.
This is the way.
Even better is Usenet 🤫
Except you’re still paying for extremely inflated storage costs, on top of your Usenet fee, which is roughly the same cost as a pirate share - depending on what you’re paying for i.e. block vs monthly.
True, but I was talking about private indexers, not shares. I guess I’m lucky that I bought a fuck ton of drives before the bullshit.
I have a good bit of storage, around 60tb usuable.
But as those drives die, I will not replace them at these prices.
I have used the free trials of a couple different jellyfin shares to test them out, and was really impressed.
YMMV, but after collecting and serving my own media for around two decades, the hobby part of it isn’t as important to me as the the ability to access a large media library for the lowest cost possible.
I have a couple hundred terabytes (half of it being spare), so I’m good for awhile. If I saw excessive failure, I would eventually need to downsize, of course.
Can be… not as reliable or safe
I’ve had better reliability from Usenet, personally, but YMMV. Safe though? If you use Usenet over SSL, you don’t even need to download over VPN, if that’s what you mean.
I mean like incomplete uploads and malware
I mean, I haven’t had the malware issue and it gets removed from indexers just the same anyway :shrug:
I’ve had better success than torrenting, 100%. It’s faster, too, since it just uses SSL.
should be some cheap storage hitting the second hand market, when this AI bubble pops
Waiting for the AI bubble to pop
Same! I actually still have a decent amount of free space though, but my library is still growing.
I had to resort to used SAS drives on my server.
You can get them pretty cheap, but you absolutely have to run a full smart test and check the error correction log before using.
Plus they usually come with 5 years power on time minimum, so you’d only want to run them in any RAID/ZRAID combo that has redundancy.
Couple of people here mentioned re-encoding, but that also harms the seed count if you’re using BitTorrent as the exchange medium.
Part of the issue is that Bluray remux rips are usually in H.265 at 10 bit with Dolby Vision which pushes 4K file size into the 70-100Gb range.
That’s fine for a single movie on a bluray disk, but its atrocious for saving multiple onto a drive or NAS.
But then most encodes still almost all use H.265 or H.264 which still gives you a fat 30Gb file for 4K.
I’m pretty sure AV1 solves this issue because it has much better compression compared to H.265, especially for higher pixel content, but no Blurays are using AV1 because there’s no reduced cost in forcing a change in consumer hardware.
Plus I think AV1 technically doesn’t support Dolby Vision in proper yet.
So you can store over 500 films on a 2TB HDD. I’m failing to see the issue.
I think you need to check your math.
I’m even using jellyfin in the car with android auto to listen to music. Recently bought a external blu-ray drive so I can rip all my old CD’s and DVD’s so at least some of my data is legit :D
I’m doing the same but I’m looking for a good client that resumes playing music on startup. Any recommendations?
No I haven’t got that figured out quite yet, it seems to resume if I just connect to my stereo bluetooth as long as I haven’t touched Jellyfin between drives but not with android auto. Just figured out how to get playlists working on AA today, kind of a work around but it looks like there is a request to fix it out there.
Pinchflat right into the jellyfin server. Tada!
Same, and I was going to buy more storage but those are getting so expensive too.
I’m holding onto my classics but anything else I delete when I’m done watching it.