• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not so hard

      Politics is just politics until your own life, or the lives of your loved ones, are at grave risk

      Then, it’s no longer a political statement, it’s a requirement for survival

      In his case, ask yourself the question:

      Is it a political statement to say you’re against genocide?

    • acargitz@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Hard disagree. Lower-p politics absolutely has its place in the AGM of a professional association. That’s why we have professional associations.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I though physicians often carried the “do no harm” mantra and were onboard with showing sides against things like genocide, or female genital mutilation, etc

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The problem is that some people have wildly differing ideas on what counts as “just politics”. As an example, the doctor brings up the question “would a pride flag be banned if it make a homophobic person uncomfortable?”. To the homophobe, gender identity is “just politics”. To the gay/trans/etc person it very much is not politics.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Even suggesting certain treatment plans or choosing to provide everyone with medical care can be considered by some to be political.

    • AGM@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The ethics of the caring professions may not have political intent in that they are not concerned with pursuit of power, but they cannot help becoming political in circumstances where politics and pursuit of power threaten people deserving of care.