“Jeffries didn’t even whip the vote,” one critic said about the House minority leader, who wants to be speaker. “This is why people want a stronger leader.”

As House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries seeks to become speaker when Democrats retake Congress in January, critics questioned his leadership Tuesday after the Republican-led lower chamber effectively blocked a bid to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth by just seven votes—an outcome that may have been averted if more Democrats showed up to vote.

The 211-204 procedural vote effectively torpedoed Congressman Thomas Massie’s attempt to impeach Hegseth by sending the outgoing Kentucky Republican’s resolution to the House Judiciary Committee, where it will likely gather dust during the remainder of the GOP-controlled congressional term.

  • thunder@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    As few days as our Congress is in session, I don’t think it is too much to ask our Representatives to be present in or around the Capitol during business hours unless it is a life or death emergency. My employer wouldn’t keep me around if I was slacking off whenever I felt like it.

  • lucyph0r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ah, so all of Congress is the old boys network. You don’t call out one of your own if you want to have a future in the big business of government.

  • TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m very disappointed in my rep, Melanie Stansbury. She won’t get my vote again. I wrote a message to her on the government contact form, saying as much. Fat lot of good that will do.

  • rynn@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Get ready for another year of protesting even with dems in Congress.

    Dems in Congress only means there’s a chance people will listen as opposed to before when there was no chance.

    We are NOT out of the woods yet.

  • LoveTrumpsHate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 hours ago

    We need new leadership!

    Chris Van Hollen is calling his colleagues: https://www.ms.now/news/van-hollen-schumer-senate-majority-leader-democrats

    Let’s get the new leadership we so desperately need!

    7 calls to help replace Schumer and Jeffries:

    1. Call Ayanna Pressley and encourage her to run for speaker of the house. She would be a great leader in addition to being the first black speaker of the house - which eliminates Hakeem Jeffries false claim only racists oppose him.

    https://pressley.house.gov/contact-us/

    1. Call Senator Chris Van Hollen and encourage him to run for Senate leader to oust Chuck Schumer.

    https://www.vanhollen.senate.gov/ Numbers at the bottom of the page

    1. Call your representative and urge them to support Ayanna Pressley for speaker of the house.

    4 & 5) Call your senators and demand they support Chris Van Hollen and oppose Chuck Schumer for Senate leader.

    http://5calls.org/issue/house-senate-leadership/

    1. Call Chuck Schumer and demand he step down as Senate leader: (202) 224-6542

    2. Call Hakeem Jeffries and demand he step down as house leader: (202) 225-5936

    Repeat every day until we have new leaders.

  • slickgoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I understand that 10 of the 11 Dem no-shows take money from Israel’s super pac, AIPAC.

    I’m happy to be corrected, but that is my understanding.

    Follow the money.

  • MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The 11 Democratic members of the House who were not present for the procedural vote on the Pete Hegseth impeachment resolution are:

    • Julia Brownley (Calif.)
    • Lou Correa (Calif.) — note: the report notes he was recovering from a medical procedure and unable to travel
    • Laura Gillen (NY)
    • Steven Horsford (Nev.)
    • Jonathan Jackson (Ill.)
    • Nancy Pelosi (Calif.)
    • Brittany Pettersen (Colo.)
    • Melanie Stansbury (NM)
    • Haley Stevens (Mich.)
    • Marilyn Strickland (Wash.)
    • Frederica Wilson (Fla.)
  • AvaMadison_27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    When leadership can’t get everyone on the same page, people start asking serious questions. What do you think this vote says about the party’s direction?

    • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What do you think has changed in the house since the election? You do know none of the winners are sworn until January, right?

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The will of the American voters has been expressed. And we were loud and clear.

        That’s what changed.

  • cocorio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Majority of dems who didn’t vote, also had funding to their campaigns through aipac. Looking at you Marylin Strickland.

  • Malyca@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Jeffires is comprised by both Israel and Trump. Secret meetings with Kushner and sucking Bibi’s dick, swearing off getting justice and calling it revenge. You could fill a book with good reasons why he should not only never have additional power, he should be primaried and replaced asap.

  • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    So stupid. This was never going to pass.Who would think that it would? (makeup of house and senate are unchanged until January).

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It wasn’t intended to pass. It was intended to give republicans the opportunity to reconsider their loyalty to Mike Johnson and trump, in the context of the incoming power change. Some of them may want to break ranks and signal that now. Or not.

      • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Maybe, but I think it was more of an attack on Jefferies. It was intended to show how ineffectual and incompetent Jefferies is.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Jeffries didn’t even whip the vote. He told people to ‘vote their conscience,’ and 11 members of his caucus didn’t show up,” writer Laura Bassett wrote on social media. “This is why people want a stronger leader.”

    Jeffries is a piece of shit and shouldn’t be anywhere near any leadership position…

    But whipping votes is the job of the second in line…

    A job with the literal title “minority whip”…

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katherine_Clark

    We can’t just focus on two popular names, we need to flush all the neoliberals out of leadership.

    All that being said, votes just happen whenever with no warning. It’s way past time that these votes need to be scheduled in advance. Instead of “vote starts now” at least “vote starts in 24 hour, exactly at ____ o’clock”

    Once the main vote happens, there can be exceptions for follow ups, like “next vote in one hour”

    The current way shit is done is fucking stupid

    • CountVon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      A job with the literal title “minority whip”…

      That is not the official title for that position, though it’s commonly called that. The official title is Assistant Minority Leader, because the person in that position reports to the House Minority Leader. Katherine Clark shares responsibility for this failure, but the buck stops at the top, and that’s Jeffries. It’s literally part of Jeffries’ job to tell the Assistant which votes should get whipped. The Assistant doesn’t typically decide that on their own.

    • Carl@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      All that being said, votes just happen whenever with no warning. It’s way past time that these votes need to be scheduled in advance. Instead of “vote starts now” at least “vote starts in 24 hour, exactly at ____ o’clock”

      Yeah, it’s worth noting because the vote was called right after many Dems left for a break. And then when the call went out for all the Dems to scramble back, many were too far away and couldn’t make it before the vote was held.

      • Instigate@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Is that a thing that can happen? Here in Australia our parliament is designed in such a way that the chamber (House or Senate) is no more than three minutes walk from every parliamentarian’s office and, when a vote is held where a formal division is required, they ‘ring the bells’ (literally a ringing bell with alarms in every office) for exactly four minutes so every parliamentarian has the ability to make it to the chamber for the vote before they lock the doors. To design a parliament or congress building in any other way seems insane to me.

        • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That sounds like a good system set up in good faith. The USA government was set up in very bad faith, by men who thought they could own people like cattle

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Voting by our representatives should take place over the course of a week. They can use web cameras to discuss the topic, a publicly recorded version of Discord, and so on. I want my reps to drink coffee, talk out the issues, and be able to submit their vote without time pressure.

        Our systems are rooted in being physically present, yet make mental presence optional.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It’s honestly depressing how little thought people put into this stuff, not every rage addict is a trump supporter these days. Uninformed angry people are all over, and they really want to share opinions

    • 🇨🇦GreenBeard🇨🇦@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That’s why majority leader is an important position. Because they’re SUPPOSED to keep this kind of childish bullshit from happening. If you elect adults, this doesn’t happen. If you elect children (including those AARP age), you get the level of administration you voted for.