I have a buddy who uses AI to read through contracts to identify high risk commitments that might cost the company money. There are thousands more uses .

Very frustrating for sure. Like any tool, it’s up to humans to know when the tool is useful.

There you go. The story is so much more believable now. /s

Please do feel free to repost the story from a source you find acceptable.

AI is here, another tool to use…the correct way. Very reasonable approach from Torvalds.

It certainly isn’t clear. I’m not going to accept a story from a source I’ve never heard of without scrutiny.

There’s a part of me that wants it to be true because I truly despise this administration, but it still deserves a critical eye.

You can’t even blame your human accountant.

I can only imagine the kind of mess they left the room in, but you would think a call to the coach would have happened.

The industrial carbon tax hasn’t been removed. The carbon taxes placed on food production are still in place.

Lewis needs time to communicate his platform to Canadians. I don’t think he’s in any hurry to run in a byelection.

Forestry Service just talks to a reorganization in an effort to streamline. The article from this thread is filled with wild claims that originally appeared in a Facebook post.

Taxing food production to increase the price of food is not going to save the planet.

Removing the carbon tax on food production is investing in basic necessities. Lowering the costs means lower prices at the til.

A quick google search will give you the history.

Really enjoy WXRV 95.9 The River Boston. You can stream from a number of sources.

It is considered international for transit passage.

They collect a tax bonanza because of the increase in the price of gas. Then they can give some of it back and play hero. Far better to scrap the industrial carbon tax which affects the price of everything, including food.

Considering the rhetoric of the story, and the misinformation, I don’t put much stock into it. Yahoo has never been a source of biased information and I have no idea who the other source is, or who their sources are (Facebook?).

You have to grow the economy (gdp) if you want real growth without inflation. It’s always easy to say someone else should pay for it, but we do need to ask ourselves what the purpose of government is. The more the government spends, the more inflation we have, especially when it produces demands for goods and services beyond current production capabilities.

So the real solution is for the government to help businesses and industries grow so they can be more competitive, hire more people, grow the gdp.

Which are also paid by the consumer. Industrial carbon taxes make everything more expensive.