And N should be Not (Knot) or Nome (Gnome)
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
Joined 22 days ago
Cake day: August 17th, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
No there is no algorithm that can guarantee a draw.
whatstatersprecious@lemmy.worldto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Property taxes should be proportional to the number of homes you own
1·3 days agoSame in the US. It’s called a homestead exemption
whatstatersprecious@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Leashing kids is just bizarreEnglish
35·11 days agoGet a leash! You want another gorilla to get shot?
whatstatersprecious@lemmy.worldto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•This crazy assassin character, who doesn't know what shampoo is, somehow would bother shaving her armpitsEnglish
21·14 days agoWtf are you talking about
whatstatersprecious@lemmy.worldto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•This crazy assassin character, who doesn't know what shampoo is, somehow would bother shaving her armpitsEnglish
53·15 days agoYes… Americans are to blame for the BBC show…
whatstatersprecious@lemmy.worldto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•google's getting pissy about using their shit while logged outEnglish
191·21 days agoIf the problem is a lack of suitable alternatives, that’s not the user’s fault. Google even snapped up Waze.
They need to use something. You suggesting they should just go make their own Google Maps?

It’s not a technicality. We’re discussing whether chess is a “solved game” or not.
That’s a much different standard than whether Stockfish can reliably beat Magnus Carlsen. Of course the engines are better than humans. They have been for a long time at this point.
Chess is not a solved game. If there was a bot that could provably always draw, that would mean it’s solved (as a draw). To be clear, I’m not saying that the bot would just have a perfect drawing record - I’m saying that it literally could never lose, even when playing against the absolute best possible moves.