Choice? I don’t use one but that’s due to never exposing ports that don’t need to be. Some that do that would still want one to provide “belt and suspenders”. Others want a specific one vs another primarily due to the software they use, that others do not. Given how trivial it is to install one does it really matter? I’m fine if they do as long as it is easy to remove, i.e., not a critical system/global dependency. I always install and remove some anyway, don’t you?
It’s wonderful but can be less complete or even missing typically due to settings (e.g., security), the environment (e.g., a container), or both.
Keep in mind that you need backups perhaps moreso than you did when using OneDrive - 3-2-1 being robust without going crazy.
Ditto VPN vulnerabilities. Belt and suspenders can help though if a remote is compromised likely all the things it uses will be, if not immediately then eventually.
1.1.1.1 does no filtering. 9.9.9.9 does, similar to 1.1.1.2. To skip filtering use 9.9.9.10.
Hell I’ve seen 30 days. Sometimes they are using a third-party - it still should be almost immediate these days.
Fraud. It takes a while for them to receive the funds even though they are charged against your account almost instantly.
I expect they think that a significant percentage of people that have Internet also have a smartphone. They probably aren’t far wrong.
They are: ping 0xC0.0xA8.1.1 or 0x7F.1
Standard scanf number parsing is generally used though some OSes reject that.
Be sure to use an online type that always powers the output via the batteries, rather than a backup type the switches to battery after the input looks bad.