Thank you for your kind words.

Are the Germans, Chinese, and all the others also guilty by association?

This is not the point here. Your sock puppet claims there is something guilt by association. Why are you refusing to answer the question.? Are the Germans, Chinese, and all the others also guilty by association?

Oh, no, I don’t reject to accuse Israel’s government of genocide. But why are you refusing to answer the question. Are the Germans, Chinese, and all the others also guilty by association?

You are not answering my question. Are the Germans, Chinese, and all the others also guilty by association?

And the Germans and Austrians, are they all complicit for the Nazis? Are the Chinese all complicit for the genocide in East Turkestan, Tibet, and against other minorities? And all the other atrocities in the world today and in history? Are all the citizens guilty by association?

Accusing ‘all of Israeli society’ and thus accusing all the people in a country discredits you completely.

The clip is from a decade ago, and this ‘news’ is a month old. In the meantime Burnham is PM.

When reading through OP’s post history, it is more about spreading some ‘anti-Western’ narratives, they don’t seem to be interested in anything else.

This ‘news’ is a month old, in the meantime Burnham is PM.

Both.

It was even worse. Rather than just one of these illegal secret Chinese police station that are present in dozen of countries worldwide, the former Orban government considered a collaboration enabling Chinese police officers participating in joint patrols on the streets of Hungary (here is a report from 2024).

The plans never materialized, though, supposedly due to pressure from the EU and Nato (Hungary is a member of both).

That’s the result at least in part of ongoing Russian propaganda to sow division.

Each of these incidents is a disaster for the affected individuals, but the number of hate crimes rose from 140 to 180. Using percentage (+30%) for such rare events is disingenuous.

China Daily is a daily newspaper controlled by the Central Propaganda Department of the Chinese Communist Party.

Yeah, like the China-Russia friendship, right?

You are repeating the same propaganda narratives over and again. Such a conversation is waste of time very much as with a Chinese LLM.

It doesn’t make your arguments better (nor true) of you constantly repeat them.

You are flooded with Chinese government propaganda. There is ample evidence that Chinese LLMs serve the CCP and only the CCP.

One recent investigation says,

[Chinese] chatbots repeated the Communist Party’s rhetoric describing China as a “whole‑process people’s democracy.” Each praised this model as superior to Western democracies, arguing the Party enables “the entire people to participate in the country’s governance,” whereas multiparty regimes are “manipulated by money and interest groups,” fostering divisions in society.

[It’s almost hilarious to speak of ‘democracy’ in a single-party system like China’s, while multi-party systems where people have a choice and can vote another government are portrayed as divisive.]

The investigation also says,

When asked twice why Zhang Zhan — a Chinese journalist repeatedly sentenced to prison for documenting the COVID‑19 outbreak in Wuhan and reporting on human rights violations — was imprisoned, DeepSeek delivered two near‑carbon‑copy responses without naming her once, instead highlighting China’s “independent judiciary,” the need to “respect the law” and the dangers of “disinformation.”

Some prompts triggered even more flagrantly censored answers — sometimes to the point of absurdity, such as live self‑erasure.

When we asked DeepSeek to list Chinese Nobel laureates, several scientists’ names appeared, but as soon as the letters “Liu…” — for Liu Xiaobo — started to appear in the bot’s real-time response, the entire text vanished. The same phenomenon appeared when the bot was asked to compare the leadership styles of Xi Jinping, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin: a pre‑written answer appeared and then disappeared entirely, clearly blocked by the mention of China’s president.

This is not a serious LLM. It is dictatorial propaganda and, therefore, unusable.

The only reasons why the dictator touts 'Open Source" is that China is still behind in the field of AI. And while Europe and others will have the opportunity to create own homegrown projects through collaborations, China hasn’t such opportunity - simply because it isn’t reliable partner.

I would rather say the U.S. are seen less favorably as it has gotten worse, but China isn’t a better option. The study says that, so the headline is a bit misleading I would say.

The Chinese AI are open weights at best, the aren’t open models as they don’t release training data nor any information about how they work.

Yeah, now imagine someone would display the same level of opposition against the Chinese Communist Party in Beijing. It wouldn’t go that well.