Why haven’t more added ActivityPub & joined the fediverse or threadiverse?

Warning about sexual harrassment just isn’t something the owners of AI bots want them to do.

And a lifetime of death threats.

Rich but with high running costs so reportedly still depends on discretionary gifts from the king. Powerful? That’s debatable now, with how many in the UK seem to hate him after years of bad press.

To be fair, it’s nothing he did that makes him a target for criminals. It’s the fault of the UK making him a famous child and now-remotely possible future head of state, so the UK should probably restore balance by keeping him safe while here.

So you mean it’s both nationalist and socialist? I think I’ve heard of parties like that somewhere before.

It says the bot they use to check stock is increasingly blocked, possibly by sites trying to avoid overload by AI scrapers. Shame.

Websites that require javascripting to even display also waste energy and heat the world.

Zuck has yet to see a grift he doesn’t want a slice of?

REcaptcha isn’t a captcha. It’s an audiovisual skills test that robots can pass & many humans can’t.

The 1976 summer oldies rant about is now not even in the top ten UK hottest days.

Surely it’s appropriate to include drownings if more people are getting into water to cool off?

Petitions are the perfect example, it gives people the illusion that they’re having an effect. But in reality, when those 10k petitions are hit, it’s up to the houses discretion whether they even want to talk about it.

Yes, the way the UK Parliament handles petitions is absolutely terrible. Even though they are required to hear any petition that gets 100k, a House committee basically decides whether it gets treated seriously or not. What’s really needed is a national equivalent of public questions to local government. I can understand that there would have to be some sort of signature or support-gathering requirement or ranking because first-come-first-served-with-a-time-limit (which is what happens at local government) would become an unfair fastest-finger-first contest each time the questions queue opened, but it could be better than the petitions.

Starmer to unveil compulsory online ID checks by the backdoor, more like.

Especially if coned.

Doesn’t mean it has the user’s ID.

Possibly propaganda, but a past government. The funder of that game, “Prevent”, was a scheme started under the ill-fated Cameron government and by 2023, I think that was the Sunak government.

Then again, why shouldn’t people who act as if they’re being radicalised in the game not expect their character to be nearly arrested in the game? It’s extremely twisted if someone from an immigrant nation like the UK starts protesting against immigration, it’s not going to end well and it’s probably better for the game to explain that reality than pretend those protests don’t have a downside.

The game is from 2023. Not much to do with the current government. It was also an attempt to stop radicalisation, not shame people for having stupid views on immigration.

The game when it was online would report you for taking “wrong” decision

Are you sure? The article seems to say it would have told you that your actions in the game scenario would have resulted in reporting, but the wording seems ambiguous.

It says €14.99/month for life. And why is eircom now an Irish branch of a Jersey company? Tax dodging?