I feel bad for making you frustrated. It wasn’t my intention. I think these text based format just makes things weird for us. You sound like someone I could have had a nice conversation on this topic without frustrations if we were discussing IRL.

For what its worth, my original intent was to discuss different approaches to distribution of labour rather than talking about hunter gatherer society. I have weird way of talking where i can’t help but justify my reasoning, so hunters gatherer was the justification for different physiology. And different physiology was the setup for the discussion on distribution of labour.

What I found strange about myself is that I (and so many others including you) believe in equal distribution of labour in household despite having different physiology. But I support proportional distribution of labour when it comes broader society ie rich and priviledge should contribute more than poor and underpriviledged.

And I kinda find this strange about myself (also generally) that we have different views when looking at society versus household.

If i make a claim that we can’t know actual capability between a couple therefore equal distribution of labour is fair then a similar argument can be made about rich vs poor.

Anyways, I have a bad habit of making everything too political, this is a meme community so maybe i need to dial down that political side of me.

Yes very true. Body language is super important in conversations like this.

For me what felt strange is that, I am a propnent of sharing household responsibilities between men and women equally. So basically equality despite difference in capability. But then, when it comes to society in general, I don’t believe in equal responsibility ie rich and privilegded ppl should have more responsibility than underprivileged. And this makes me feel like a hypocrite you know?

On one example, I am thinking of equality and the other proportionality.

I guess my idealogy is still incomplete.

Im not gonna continue further, already made too many people “angry”. Somehow this convo became about humans being hunters and what not. And not the original conversation about dishes and dragons.

My whole point was about women having different physiology than men. Please fight the scientists who are researching this, not me.

Yeeeeeaaaah, comments like this was exactly why i said sorry first. Help your partners folks!

This is the third paragraph from the article you provided “Researchers found the female body was better suited for endurance activity…”

Which is what my explanation is based on

Sorry to be like this but im sure an argument like this would be thrown your way if this was posted in a big enough room.

Isn’t this how we function evolutionarily? Like in a hunter and gatherers society, men were predominantly the ones required to do “one-hit” labour like hunting, whereas women were predominantly the ones doing “continual” labour like gathering food.

This also reflects in our bodies in many ways like our risk tolerance and physiological stuff. There are 2 types of muscles in human body, one that are needed for quick one-off work and other that are good for continual work. And men have the “one-hit” type more and women the other type. Afaik, this also shows up in endurance training and strength training. Men are generally more capable in strength one, while women are more capable in endurance.

So going by the principle of “to each acc to their capability, to each acc to their need”, it would mean that women should do more of folding sheets while men should do more “dragon killing”

If snake make male and female both had 2 genitals, you could create an infinite sex chain.

That’s called companionate love.

We evolved to have that type of love cuz being together with our partners longer (even without sex) meant our children will have higher liklihood of surviving.

But we also need horny love (called passionate love) to maximize spreading genes.

Based on what i know, they have their own set of morals where they justify these things. And surprisingly, they are very strict about their “laws” and “honour”.

Source: i am from a third world country, was kinda friends with those type of people (or atleast their siblings) during school.

Reticulum has built in support for sending or receiving data on multiple layers like internet bluetooth wife etc. Mestastic doesn’t. Also meshtastic can be less resource efficient cuz it sends a lot of probing messages.

Source: watched a youtube video once so i am not 100% sure about the second point

Edit: lol, wifi not wife, but who know maybe wife can also forward messages from reticulum

I didn’t say anything about iranian government. I will criticize iran when the illegal US-Israeli assult ends.

Remember condemnation of Hamas never stopped the palestinian genocide. It wouldn’t stop the killing of iranian.

You are trying to come off as someone cares about people but you are failing to recognize what I just wrote.

42 years of sanctions+the environmental impact of black rain+the destruction of public infrastructure probably kills more

Iran said they were holding back due to ramadan cuz its a holy month and they shouldn’t be doing war in holy months.

Theres no place for nuance here, get outta here! /s

That’s actually incorrect, the light reflected by the mirror is time delayed based on 2 x the width of glass on the mirror so you are just kissing a slightly older version of you.

A world renowned scientist like neil should know better