I’d just like to interject for a moment…

  • 0 Posts
  • 17 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle


  • juipeltje@lemmy.worldtoLinux Gaming@lemmy.mllutris-minus-ai
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    From an ideological point of view i respect the fact that people want software to stay free of AI, but realistically how feasible is it going to be to have something be completely free of it? If someone for example contributes to this project and they used AI assistance to write the code, but never disclose it, how would you know? When that happens this “minus-ai” fork will also have AI code in it and there’s nothing you can do about that it seems.



  • I’m confused on why you think ubuntu and omarchy can’t also be part of that “culture” you describe. It’s also a bit different for omarchy. Part of it is that it’s just another arch flavor that isn’t all that special, but everyone started talking about it all of a sudden, which made people grow tired of hearing about it pretty quickly (kinda reminds me of what happened to ghostty tbh). The other part of it is its creator being a conspiracy weirdo, which puts people off.



  • You can choose between things like flatpak or aur packages, but you’re gonna have to use pacman either way, since your core packages are still managed by pacman even if you decide to install most things through flatpak. Just wanted to point that out in case you were thinking of not using it at all anymore, cause it’s definitely not good to have your system get extremely out of date overtime. Having said that, it’s a matter of preference. The aur has more packages available, but flatpak has verified packages available, so assuming you stick to those, it could be safer. It also offers things like sandboxing. When i was on arch i only used the aur. I usually go with whatever has the most packages available or whatever is most convenient.