dbdr

Yes. It’s literally in the second paragraph:

while accounting for socioeconomic considerations as well

In Blackburn, England.

Once you’re comfortable with (neo)vim, is there any reason to use nano?

The tide has turned.

Ukraine is starting to regain more ground than it is losing for the first time since 2023. Ukrainian forces liberated more territory than they lost in the last two weeks of February 2026 for the first time since the Summer 2023 counteroffensive. Russian forces suffered a net loss of 116 square kilometers of territory in April 2026. Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief General Oleksandr Syrskyi stated on May 15 that precise Ukrainian strikes, the destruction of Russian reserves, and constant pressure on Russian assault units have allowed Ukrainian forces to increasingly seize the tactical initiative and force Russian forces to react to a Ukrainian-defined operational tempo.

https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/ukraines-intermediate-range-strike-campaign-and-new-mechanized-attacks-herald-the-start-of-a-new-phase-of-the-war/

Big car safe (video)

Sir/Lady, you are talking on the internet. People won’t know where your “here” is 😉

Yes. Violence, by definition, requires physical force

It’s possible to define it like that, but it’s definitely not universally the case and seems overly restrictive. Just one example from the WHO’s World report on violence and health:

Violence at work involves not only physical but also psychological behaviour. Many workers are subjected to bullying, sexual harassment, threats, intimidation and other forms of psychological violence.

Words are not physical violence

The person you respond to didn’t say that words are physical violence.

Do you believe the only form of violence is physical violence?

No, it means it’s almost surrounded. Lichtenstein is not part of the EU.

They found that those who ate the highest amount of ultra-processed food every day had a 58% increased risk of developing dementia and a 46% increased risk for cognitive impairment compared to people who ate the lowest amount of daily ultra-processed food.

That’s a huge effect.

This BBC article is doing an ok job. It’s true that Trump claims that a deal is near. They also point out the history:

Trump has previously claimed a deal with Iran was close without one materialising.

[…]

On 20 April, Trump said a deal with Iran would be made “relatively quickly”, and both he and senior administration figures suggested negotiations were progressing in the weeks that followed.

But on 27 May, after reports the two sides were close to an agreement, Trump said he was “not satisfied” with its terms. Talks have continued since.

[…]

Hours before the latest comments on an impending deal, Trump had said “the United States will be hitting Iran… very hard tonight” while threatening to seize Kharg Island and other oil infrastructure points “in the not too distant future”.

What do you do that’s impractical in NixOS?

I don’t understand how anyone is still pushing coal.

I think it’s purely stupid tribalism. “Democrats are against coal, so it must be good.”

It’s true taking inflation into account would be useful. But when the increase was 5 to 7 times more in 4 years, inflation would not make a big difference.

OP has now explained that the original link had an article that then disappeared. I think that answers your questions.

From the blog:

we can promise to listen and be aware. People’s remaining pain point are and will be on our radar, so please take this time to communicate them.

I don’t hear this as “legacy can go to hell”. They care about fixing remaining issues as much as possible.

At some point, that’s a better use of time than maintaining two display servers forever.