I see, I see. TBH I think wood > cologne is a bit too far of a leap, but I think they are slightly lenient with something more like perfume > cologne. I’ve never seen them go back and change points. But I haven’t watched that much of it to know for certain.

Come back 1 year

It’s not “is your answer correct?”, it’s “did anyone in the survey say that?”

How did you know :fry:

You forgot rules 1 and 2

No

No soup for you

Damn, Madonna looking busted

Fair for you to make that argument, but now that’s a different argument than what this video is about. In the first 2 minutes he explicitly says the video “is about the modern internet”

But as you said the point is that “excessive passive consumption has made people unable to research information for themselves”. And as mentioned in the video title, algorithms, which I think everyone else here can agree does not refer to radio broadcasts, are part of that problem.

I’ve watched like every video this guy has made 😅. I still think the implication is that today’s algorithms are making this problem way worse.

Bitwarden

That’s very different than the personalized algorithms of today’s internet

Radio and broadcast TV were not “algorithms” as discussed here

That, or it means they want you to say a number first so they can lowball you

I use a different email alias for every single company that all forward to my single email account. Services that I recommend are Addy.io or SimpleLogin

In a corporate role you can have hundreds of meetings a month. Yeah, they can get lost.

IDK anything about this, but I would assume its more complex than max G force

Some people propose a universal basic income funded by taxes on corporations or automated systems. But why would company owners voluntarily agree to support people who have become economically “unnecessary”? Who would force them to pay those taxes?

The workers must force them to

Sadly “AI this, AI that” is the entire world rn