Neither can a woman without a man.

Well, with one famous exception.

No.

Since language is always subject to interpretation, any LLM that is regulated by language will be able to interpret its own limitations.

While interesting, we have to dismiss the fact that going pre-natal means the child is in a neutral state. The child is completely symbiotic with the mother during pregnancy and both her past and current experiences become directly transferred to the child through both her emotional, hormonal and nutritional profile, which of course is strongly influenced by the father.

Children simply do not exist separate from their parents in any meaningful capacity.

You can resolve the past and create your own future, you are never stuck anywhere regardless of what happened to you.

The first thing to understand is that nobody understands the obesity crisis at all.

The second thing to understand is that the human body naturally stays at a healthy weight, just like any other animal, unless a person has become completely out of touch with their bodies. It cannot be solved with control or medicine.

The third thing to understand is that we teach people to dissociate from their bodies from childhood.

So we do not have an obesity crisis, we have a disembodiment crisis. And obesity is only one of the thousands of horrible effects it creates.

Go and observe a tree, and then compare your experience to the word “tree” in your mind. Even among the same species, of the same age, in the same area, each tree is absolutely unique. Its shape is different, its size is different, its texture is different, even its energy differs - and for those billions and billions of unique and individual lifeforms on earth you have the word… “tree”.

Then there’s thinking about right and wrong which is infinitely more complex.

Thinking has no connection to reality.

Anyone that goes along with the two party system just endlessly postphones any real societal change. And what do people who want the status quo to remain always say?

“Obviously you can see that we can’t change that right now, but if you support where we are for this election, surely we’ll get to what you want one day!” How long have they promised this? These are the words of every exploiter ever, and it never ends.

It’s not vagueposting, you want to discuss right and wrong and you don’t know Jung? You’re doomed to fail no matter what you do.

On your last point you’re once again arguing for the lesser evil, which will perpetuate evil until the end of time.

The moment someone thinks they’re right, they’re wrong by definition. Thinking is memetic and reductive, it has no connection to reality.

You seem to be very confused about what leftism is, though I can’t blame you. With your condescending tone it sounds like you’ve probably thought yourself the smartest person in the room for quite a while because you’ve been surrounded by extraordinarily stupid people, and now you think that that means you’re smart, and not just slightly less stupid. That leads to some serious blind spots.

Leftism is whatever the majority of the people identifying themselves as leftist believe it is - it doesn’t have anything to do with the Democratic party, every politician is in that for different reasons, and most just to enrich themselves and avoid having to do an honest day’s work.

US Politics is just realpolitik, I’m sorry to tell you but if there even is one or two actual sincere politicians in either of the parties the system is designed to make sure they never get any real power. You saw that with Sanders. And that’s if we pretend he’s actually sincere. His actual track record doesn’t prove him to be interested in anything other than his own virtue-signalling.

Mamdani is not a Leftist, he’s a Muslim, he champions a faith that would out right kill a large percentage of leftists for their beliefs and life choices. You can’t be a Leftist Muslim, obviously. Religion and religious fanaticism is Right-wing.

You’re of course right that the Left is the lesser evil by far, but people don’t want the lesser evil, they want something that isn’t evil. Like I said, nobody wants to live in either of the two dystopic hellscapes the left or the right envisions. They don’t even want to live that way themselves, they just become more and more extreme due to their war with each other. They both represent false extremes that only exist in relation to each other, they’re not real ideologies anymore, they’re counter-reactions.

Nothing will change if you keep going along with the two-party system. Your argument for the lesser evil is just your own self-serving desire to have your own guys win. Neither of you should win, and you don’t even have an identity without each other. You’re a manifestation of two opposed aspects of human psychology that refuse to integrate with the other half. Whatever you do will become sick and toxic because it rests on the suppression of the other half which will simply rule from the unconscious instead, becoming much more dangerous.

It’s like if sunshine and rain were deadlocked in some kind of ideological battle while the whole world would perish if either side actually won.

The whole thing is like some kind of Jungian satire piece.

No, that’s been the same in all ages. Childhood is magical because you don’t carry the mental burden of your own survival. Cavemen adults didn’t think it was joyful or magical when food or water became scarce and they had to decide between relocating and possible dying in the wild or in war against some other tribe, or staying and risk watching everyone they know die of starvation.

Leftists think that, for sure, but nobody else does.

The Right wants to hold on for the sake of holding on, the Left wants to burn everything down for the sake of burning everything down, both exist only in relation to each other as two extremes, ordinary people just can’t relate to that kind of fanaticism.

Ordinary people aren’t ideologues, they just want practical solutions to concrete problems. They don’t want to live under a holy authority, nor in some nihilist sexual degeneracy.

You’ve got feminists saying things like they’ll abort male children, when people on the right read that they get even more extreme, and so on.

In many ways the left is motivated by tearing down anything people on the right believe in; which makes the right react even more extremely as well, which in turn aggravate the left further, and so on.

It’s a cycle that never ends because neither side wants to create anything, they just want to destroy the other side.

That’s what culture war is.

And it will only get worse.

The rise of the far left.

4th wave feminism is a big one, for example.

As always these things feed off of each other.

How so?

🎶 Never moind I’ll foind…🎶

“He brought me ultimate liberation”

People never stop to consider that “life” and “control” are diametrically opposed.

Choose wisely - no one on their deathbeds wish they had ‘controlled’ more.

Meditation.

There was never any stability in the world, but in times such as these it becomes painfully apparent.

The only place of stability is within.

That ironically also leads to the highest stability without.

My eyes definitely fear it

I can’t tell you whether the post is fake, but I can tell you this exact situation was researched in my country and found to be correct and then was never heard from again

Truly

You know the funny part? It goes all the way. Let’s look at this dialogue from a Zen master from a 1000 years ago:

Q: What instructions have the Masters everywhere given for dhyana practice and the study of Dharma?

A: Words used to attract the dull of wit are not to be relied on.

Q: If those teachings were meant for the dull-witted, I have yet to hear what Dharma has been taught to those of really high capacity.

A: If they are really people of high capacity, where could they find people to follow? If they seek from within themselves, they will find nothing tangible; how much less can they find a Dharma worthy of their attention elsewhere! Do not look to what is called the Dharma by teachers, for what sort of Dharma could that be?

Q: If that is so, should we not seek for anything at all?

A: By conceding this, you would save yourself a lot of mental effort.