I forgot.

Many saints just took on the stories and aspects of pagan gods or heroes.

Humanity has already outgrown the cradle called earth, the longer it takes us to leave it behind the greater the risk that will destroy it and ourselves.

At least for Scotland the reason is historical, before the union they had their own pound, so they continued to mint their own coin.

Scottish notes technically aren’t legal tender even in Scotland, but this because legal tender has a very narrow meaning in relation to court debts. They’re technically promissory notes, the bank of Scotland has to hold reserves of sterling notes to cover them, although most is in special £100m value notes. Banks will accept them in England, some shops will not because they don’t recognise them and think they’re fake.

Because the people the spend all day on relationship subreddits are bitter and want everyone else to be.

How fucking hard is it to put a $2 ultrasonic distance sensor on the front. I built robots when I was a kid that wouldn’t do this.

This has been solved for 50 years FFS. Yet here we are with techbros thinking cameras can solve everything.

I’m not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible.

Defamation and/or tortious interference possibly?

Not necessarily. The standard of proof is different. Just because you couldn’t prove to the civil standard (on the balance of probabilities) that they infringed your copyright, it doesn’t mean the claim was false to a criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt).

I’d settle for the government prosecuting every false copyright claim as perjury.

Lets not throw out freedom of panorama because of AI.

I imagine they have an embedded raspberry pi type computer in the screen itself.

In theory it’s legal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_threat

There’s some irony in that sponsor block has to block four segments of the video.

Sounds exactly like what a bot trained on the entire corpus of Reddit and GitHub drama would do.

They’re called “source available”, the issue is Prusa calling something open source that isn’t open source.

Those aren’t open source licenses, they violate point six of the open source definition https://opensource.org/osd

The commercial restrictions mean this license does not meet the open source hardware definition, one that was signed by a RepRap developer called Josef Pruša. https://freedomdefined.org/OSHW

It would be good if a comment bumped a thread to the top of the “new” feed.