…what was that even supposed to be? En Passant is the closest match my brain can come up with but there is no “m” in there either.

Not for me (usually), because I know it’s a very complex game and that anyone who is more than passingly familiar with it is going to be better than me. My frustration level when I lose is directly proportional to the number of dumb mistakes I made. If I did well for my skill level and the other person just played better, then it becomes a learning opportunity rather a source of frustration.

This applies to other games as well. The only exception is when it’s a game where luck plays a big role and it just isn’t going my way that day. Then I’m not winning or learning, which can also be super frustrating.

…rather than making you allowing you to decide what kind of search experience…

I wouldn’t be so frustrated with AI popping up everywhere if we were given clear choices about whether or not we want to use it.

😘

I’m just honored to be called a legend by a shitpost.

Wouldn’t reviewing the reports and the contributions instead would be faster even if most of them are wrong?

No. That’s what this whole post is about. The current state is unsustainable and a better system is needed.

I don’t think anybody has the answers to your other questions yet - that’s the whole point of the discussion. Open source projects are facing a new challenge and the community as a whole needs to do some brainstorming and experimentation to figure out how to solve it. Video interviews may not be the right solution at all, it’s just one idea among others.

…just because ethics.

Not ethics, practicality. There are only so many people contributing so many hours to open source projects. It’s impossible to handle the entire incoming stream of reports without some filtering.

And your analogy isn’t really capturing the problem. If you want to stick with the (slightly hyperbolic) nuke analogy, it’s more like getting 9 reports that nukes are going to be launched but 6 of them name different source countries, 4 of them say it’ll actually be tomorrow night, 2 of them say the nukes will be unarmed for some reason, and one says it’s actually bottle rockets being launched. I hope you can find them in time because they’re buried among 362 other intelligence reports about god knows what, many of which are duplicates of things you already knew about. Also, you don’t know any of the sources or what their motives and competency levels are.

@OwOarchist@pawb.social didn’t say anything about banning AI usage at all, just that we need a better system to restrict contributions to people who can demonstrate that they can filter the noise out of their own contributions instead of just spamming mailing lists with everything their chosen tool spits out. No one is going to dump a valid bug report just because a contributor used AI to find it. They want to dump the endless stream of duplicate and invalid reports being submitted by people that don’t bother confirming that the reports they’re submitting are new and valid.

They don’t even have to be intentionally built in. Anything that generates unnecessary work for FOSS volunteers is a win for proprietary software companies.

Even an easy to use and well-built tool that produces good results would result in mailing list and bug report noise simply because people like to contribute. If we set aside those who are just trying to pad their resume with open source contributions and bad actors trying disrupt FOSS projects, we’re still left with a lot of well-intentioned, mostly inexperienced devs generating duplicate and/or invalid reports and requests.

Since the current state of AI tools certainly does not produce consistently good results, I don’t think organizations that are hostile to FOSS projects actually need to do anything at all for them to be disruptive. Just make their shitty tools accessible and other people will significantly contribute to maintainer burnout without even intending to.

Bring back melted wax letter seals too.

Stroking the criminals is certainly one way to handle things…

Soulfly, Soulfly II, Soulfly III, etc. I think all of their albums have one instrumental, melodic, tribal inspired song that is worlds apart from their otherwise aggressive metal.

And with a trigger warning for sexual abuse: Motōrhead - Don’t Let Daddy Kiss Me. I have never been more caught off-guard by a song than when I stumbled across this, which was only released as a single.

That damn search bar was the only reason I ever started looking at launchers. I used LG and Samsung phones for years and wanted a more streamlined interface closer to stock android, so I got a pixel.

And the very first time I turned it on, I was incredibly disappointed to see this giant Google logo nailed to the bottom of the screen, existing only to provide functionality that I don’t want.

So into the launcher rabbit hole I dove.