You realize the implication of what you wrote right? You understand what an implication is? Trying to be cute and hiding behind technicalities is pathetic and cowardly. Which honestly is par for the course for pseudo intellectual tankie trash lmao

What academic sources have you read …

Did you read your comment? It’s you. No spin needed.

Incredible. What a magical place

If you told me this was a satirical Wikipedia article I would have believed you

Honestly you’re not wrong. I started to proxy and honestly it feels so good. I’m so sick of spending so much money on cards.

I can agree with that largely but I still contend you’re conflating a few things to make that argument. Fundamentally an LLM will make predictions based on probability (ignoring temperature) and probability does not equal certainty.

It’s temperature primarily. That being said there is still a chance that an LLM can output values that are unexpected even at low temperatures.

What are you saying precisely? It’s well known that LLMs have non-deterministic output (Ilya Sutskever even claims as such). Are you saying the way it goes about retrieving tokens as deterministic?