HackThePlanet
The pool on the roof must have a leak
- 0 Posts
- 16 Comments
HackThePlanet@lemmy.mlto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Most slopcode projects are abandoned and deleted within months of releaseEnglish
17·1 day agoWe went from “everyone will know how to code in the future” to “no one know will know how to code” pretty quickly
HackThePlanet@lemmy.mlto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•jesus holding up the shutter so you can get some fresh airEnglish
6·5 days agoThere’s always a purpose for those marble abs.
HackThePlanet@lemmy.mlto
Technology@lemmy.world•Mark Zuckerberg sure sounds eager to get young people hooked on online gamblingEnglish
10·5 days agoFor those who may have forgotten, the little prince of Meta more or less started with Facemash, a site that displayed two photos side by side and asked users to vote for which person was “more attractive,” using a mechanism similar to “Hot or Not.”
All “funny” if it weren’t for:
- Privacy: using photographs of people without consent would often violate regulations and, in many countries, personal data protection laws.
- Consent: the people depicted had not chosen to participate.
- Objectification: asking people to rank solely based on their physical appearance can be seen as a form of objectification and can contribute to a disrespectful environment.
- Possible psychological effects: this type of public comparison can affect self-esteem and exclude or humiliate some people.
Not to mention what happened with Cambridge Analytica.
What do people expect from a mind like that?
The artist underestimated himself, $60 is not enough for this masterpiece
It’s truly touching how that man says, “It must have cost a fortune” for what his employees did for him. People who dedicate even a small portion of their working time to helping people, even a small gesture, and not just for money, deserve better in this world.
HackThePlanet@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Instagram running ads promoting child sexual abuse material in India, BBC findsEnglish
8·5 days agoTrue, but I think the fact that a good portion of the services were the “first” to be used also comes into play.
As an example, I always think of WhatsApp, which in my country has (unfortunately) become the messaging service used by everyone, even businesses. WhatsApp was the first to arrive in a market where no one else offered that service (or offered it at its level), and thanks to this, it has gained a following of users who now, out of laziness, don’t want to switch services even though they (perhaps) realize that there are better ones out there.
For many, they use it simply out of habit and the laziness of not wanting to switch to something else. Like those who used Internet Explorer because installing another, clearly better, browser was too much of a hassle.
Satire or not, the guy is describing a possible future of shit where I hope not to be there.
HackThePlanet@lemmy.mlto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Heat waves HATE this one WEIRD trickEnglish
3·5 days agoThat man figured out how to hack Matrix.
HackThePlanet@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Instagram running ads promoting child sexual abuse material in India, BBC findsEnglish
34·5 days agoAnother classic day at Meta. I still wonder why people use their services.
HackThePlanet@lemmy.mlto
Linux@lemmy.ml•What's your favourite "just works, day after day" Linux software?English
5·6 days agomy desire to use Linux and continue learning
Steam seems to be one of the very few services (perhaps even the only one I know of) that hasn’t transformed its product by following the trend of enshittification. I have many games on Steam, purchased years and years ago, many of which are no longer available, but I can still download and play, having purchased them back then.
I really appreciate Steam, but from what I read every day, I don’t think “forever” exists, especially online. If we think of it in terms of “everything’s in the cloud,” well, the cloud costs money, so unless they somehow dispose of data, I don’t know if a company can actually keep every single piece of data “forever” while maintaining a good price and not losing out or burdening consumers.
The same goes for physical copies: I could lose them, break them, my house burn down, and I’d lose everything, whereas if they were in the cloud, I wouldn’t have any problems. The point is that consumers should be allowed, where possible, to export what they’ve purchased. Honestly, I think that anyone who bought movies or other content on some platform and then years later discovered that the company had removed them and they could no longer use them (or worse, the same content was on another paid platform) would honestly bother me.
I don’t doubt that digital is more accessible and readily available than other formats. The biggest problem is that few services allow me to download locally what I’ve purchased.
So, for me, you’re not buying anything, you’re just renting for the long term.
Honestly, I’m tired of buying digital only to suddenly find out I can no longer use what I purchased. For these services, I prefer self-hosting or any method that allows me to have a working copy locally. At least I can decide what to do with the digital content.




Strange, I thought that paying more and more to get, in most cases, less and less was a good business move.