What about it makes you think it broken?
Still even if it was completely destroyed, its not a person that been run over by a tank which is what US imperialists insist what happened there
Like a bottle of Châteauneuf-du-Pape, I’m fine like wine when I start to rap
What about it makes you think it broken?
Still even if it was completely destroyed, its not a person that been run over by a tank which is what US imperialists insist what happened there
deleted by creator
Here’s what i post whenever it comes up, its an honestly an impressive feat of western propaganda that so many have seen that single frame but not the whole video:
Full tankman video where the tankers go to lengths to avoid harming him, he’s able to climb on the tank and then walk away with no repercussions:
Just a few examples(out of many) of US state forces running over protestors in the last couple of years:
Google will still get plenty of telemetry when you turn it on briefly, there are ways to mitigate that though





They’ve been doing it since '45


no exceptions, not even for Ju… ah I can’t even say her name! 



deleted by creator
deleted by creator


this is why i cook outside in a large cauldron over a safely banked wood-fire


https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/11/16/chinas-orwellian-social-credit-score-isnt-real/
Meanwhile the actual real Credit Score in the west ensures that most young people will never be home owners,
For all ages only 65% of usians own their home, this number is above 90% in the PRC



Rubber bullets most likely
Strange how western country employ these as well as other less-lethals like LRADs, and as recent evets in Minneapolis and historically at Kent state show US forces are fine with executing protestors, yet many westerners consider China more Authoritarian than the US, despite those facts and others such as the PRC not being in a war for 45 years while the US drops on average 45 bombs a day in the present day, and that the US has over 700 foreign military bases while every other country combined has 30(china accounts for one of those)