They said the justification he used didn’t include the ability to set tarriffs, only shut off trade entirely.

So they shouldn’t even try?

I mean, that’s at least better than no line at all… wait, why am I defending these pieces of shit!?

Successfully impeaching him after he left office may well have been enough to keep him off the ballot in '24.

Ok, I might be off base here, but I’m a bit concerned that him dying now would be much worse in the long run, just because without him being so visibly awful in the lead up to the election people are going to forget how awful everything around him was and decide to vote back in the people enabling him.

To advocate for the people annoyed at Fallout 4, it’s hardly trivial to roll back an update, and Steam at the very least tends to update automatically so it can just happen without you noticing.

Honestly this change has been a long time coming. In fact, why wasn’t this the case back when digital copies were first introduced?

Counterpoint, as a pedestrian I trust self sriving cars way less than human drivers.

This isn’t talking about gambling stuff, no. To be clear, there’s definitely a fuckton of money to be made off gamblers, but this is just about people buying appreciation “DLC” like soundtracks.

There are legitimate reasons to ask for an “all permissions” token, such as setting up and using a third party client. A game is not one of the things that should be asking for that though.